期刊文献+

硅对柱花草铝毒的解毒作用 被引量:8

Al-detoxification by Si in Stylosanthes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解硅在解除豆科作物铝毒方面的作用,本文以5个品种的柱花草为材料研究了硅对铝胁迫条件下的植物根伸长及膜脂稳定性的影响。研究结果表明,在铝(30μmol/L)胁迫条件下柱花草根伸长受阻、根尖丙二醛(MDA)含量和抗氧化酶(POD,CAT)活性显著增加,而硅(1.4mmol/L)处理增加根中硅的含量而降低了铝对根伸长、MDA含量和抗氧化酶活性的影响,且铝处理前12h供给的硅和前处理溶液及铝溶液中均加硅处理的影响均显著;在不加硅条件下西卡品种的耐铝性显著低于其它品种,而经硅预处理的植株和在预处理及铝处理期间均供应硅的植株的耐铝性不同品种间的差异不显著。这些结果表明,硅能提高柱花草的耐铝能力并影响品种间耐铝差异性。 The effect of silicon (Si) on aluminum (Al) detoxification in leguminous crops were investigated in this study by analyzing the effect of Si on root elongation and membrane lipid stability in root apices under Al stress in five cultivars of Stylosanthes. It was shown that the root elongation was inhibited and the malonaldehyde (MDA) content in root apices and the antioxidase (peroxydase and catalase) activities of root apices were increased under AI stress (30 μmol/L), while the effects of Al were significantly alleviated by the addition of Si (1.4 mmol/L). Moreover, both Si added before AI treatment and Si added simultaneously with AI treatment could alleviate these effects. On the other hand, the cultivar of Seca was shown to be more sensitive to Al than other cultivars in the absent of Si, while Al-resistance distinction among the cultivars ofstylosanthes turned to be non-significant in the present of Si in the pre-cultured solution or both pre-cultured and Al-treatment solutions. These results suggest that Si have elevated Al-resistance and affected Al-resistance distinctly differs in the Stylosanthes.
出处 《基因组学与应用生物学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期57-61,共5页 Genomics and Applied Biology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30771287) 国家973计划(2007CB108901)资助
关键词 柱花草 铝毒 解毒作用 Silicon (Si), Stylosanthes, Aluminum toxicity, Detoxification
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈义强,邓祖湖,郭春芳,陈如凯,张木清.甘蔗常用亲本及其衍生品种的抗旱性评价[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(6):1108-1117. 被引量:39
  • 2叶乃好,翟衡,杜中军,许宏.水分胁迫条件下10种苹果砧木抗旱性评价[J].果树学报,2004,21(5):395-398. 被引量:30
  • 3马雅琴,翁跃进.引进春小麦种质耐盐性的鉴定评价[J].作物学报,2005,31(1):58-64. 被引量:113
  • 4张卫星,赵致,朱德峰,柏光晓,付芳婧,曹绍书.水分和N胁迫下玉米杂交种的抗逆性及综合评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(5):17-24. 被引量:11
  • 5李贵全,张海燕,季兰,赵二开,刘建兵,李玲,张家蓉.不同大豆品种抗旱性综合评价[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2408-2412. 被引量:105
  • 6高俊凤 孙群 等.植物生理学实验技术[M].西安:世界图书出版公司,2000.137.
  • 7Garnczarska M, Bednarski W. Effect of a short-term hypoxic treatment followed by re-aeration on free radicals level and anfioxidative enzymes in lupine roots. Plant Ph)siology and Biochemistry, 2004, 42: 233-240.
  • 8Bailey-Serres J, Chang R. Sensing and signalling in response to oxygen deprivation in plants and other organisms. Annals of Botany, 2005, 96:507-518.
  • 9Dennis E S, Dolferus R, Ellis M, Rahman M, Y Wu, Hoeren F U, Grover A, Ismond K P, Good A G, Peacock W J. Molecular strategies for improving waterlogging tolerance in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51(342): 89-97.
  • 10Narayanan S, Ruma D, Gitika B, Sharma S K, Pauline T, Ram M S, llavazhagan G, Sawhney R C, Kumar D, Banerjee P K. Antioxidant activities of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) during hypoxia induced oxidative stress in glial cells. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 2005, 278: 9-14.

共引文献34

同被引文献112

引证文献8

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部