期刊文献+

舒芬太尼用于神经外科术后皮下自控镇痛的临床观察 被引量:6

Effect of Patient-controlled Subcutaneous Analgesia with Sufentanil after Craniotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价舒芬太尼用于神经外科术后患者皮下自控镇痛(PCA)的效果、安全性和实用性。方法将60例神经外科择期行开颅幕上脑肿瘤切除术后患者分为两组:持续+PCA组(CP组)和单纯PCA组(P组),每组30例。术后镇痛药物为舒芬太尼0.12mg。采用视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)对术后2h、20h、24h、44h和48h的镇痛效果进行评估,记录不良反应的发生情况。结果术后20h及24hP组患者主诉疼痛例数多于CP组(P<0.05),两组患者术后各时间点VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CP组和P组患者术后48h舒芬太尼用药总量分别为(98.73±5.96)μg和(57.25±9.73)μg,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CP组和P组患者均未发生呼吸抑制,对术后镇痛的满意度分别为90%和80%。结论对神经外科患者术后选用持续+PCA模式输注舒芬太尼镇痛效果确切,血流动力学稳定,镇痛总体满意率高。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sufentanil used for patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia (PCSA) with different models after craniotomy. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients undergoing craniotomy were randomly divided into two groups with or without background infusion. Sufentanil 0. 12 mg was used via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and no loading dose was administered. The PCA device was programmed background infusion of 1 ml/h, bolus dose of 0.5 ml in group of using continuance plus PCA model (group CP) and bolus dose of 0.75 ml without background infusion in group P. Hour limit of 3 ml/h, lockout time of 15 minutes were set in two groups. Postoperative pain was assessed at rest and when moving, using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2 h, 20 h, 24 h, 44 h and 48 h after operation. Side-effects were also recorded systematically during the first 48 h after surgery. Results No significant differences were observed in patients' physical status, fentanyl consumption during operation and anaesthetic time. There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups within 48 h after operation, but the incidence of complaining postoperative pain was significantly more in group P than that in group CP at 20 h and 24 h after surgery ( P 〈0.05). The cumulative analgesic consumption of sufentanil in group CP and group P were 98.73±5.96 μg and 57.25±9.73 μg, respectively ( P 〈0.05). Compared with group P, the mean arterial pressure in 20 h and 24 h were significantly lower in group CP ( P 〈0.05). The sedation degree and the incidence of nausea, vomiting in two groups had no significant differences. No restrain of respiration occurred in two groups. The patients' satisfactory rate with PCA in group CP and group P were 90% and 80%, respectively. Conclusion PCSA with sufentanil and continuance plus PCA model is an effective and safe analgesic method after craniotomy.
作者 彭昆 王保国
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 2009年第2期173-175,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 患者自控镇痛 神经外科 舒芬太尼 皮下注射 patient-controlled analgesia neurosurgery sufentanil subcutaneous injection
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1De Benedettis G, l.orenzetti A, Migiiore M, et al. Postoperative pain in neurosurgery: a pilot study in brain surgery[J]. Neurosurgery, 1996,38:466 470.
  • 2Quiney N, Cooper R, Stoneham M, et al. Pain after craniotomy: a time for reappraisal[J]. Br J Neurosurg,1996,10:295 - 299.
  • 3韩如泉,李学斌,王保国,王恩真.神经外科术后疼痛的调查[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(6):376-377. 被引量:51
  • 4Bailey PL, Streisand JB, East KA, et al. Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil[J]. Anesth Analg,1990,70:8-15.
  • 5林传尧,岳云,柳娟.舒芬太尼术后病人自控静脉镇痛的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(1):51-52. 被引量:215
  • 6胡双飞,钱军,严蔚.舒芬太尼用于高血压病人肺切除术后镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(11):855-856. 被引量:31
  • 7Fugare F, Dorle P, Veillette Y. Evaluation of the activity of postop erative analgesia department in Canadian hospital[J].Ann Fr Anesth Rev,1996015(2):313-317.
  • 8Geller E, Chrubasik J, Graf R, et al. A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural or epidural sufentanil versus intravenous sufentanil or epidural fentanyl analgesia after major abdominal sur gery[J]. Anesth Analg,1993,76:1243-1250.
  • 9仲吉英,狄高梅,安建雄,陈雷,刘进.芬太尼病人自控镇痛与常规吗啡镇痛用于心外科术后的对照研究[J].中国循环杂志,2000,15(2):110-112. 被引量:19
  • 10Bordner G, Van Aken H, Hertle L, et al. Multimodal periopera tire management-combining thoracic epidural analgesia, forced mo bilization, and oral nutrition-reduces hormonal and metabolic stress and improves convalescence after major urologic surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2001,92(1) : 1594- 1600.

二级参考文献19

  • 1段世明.舒芬太尼临床药代动力学研究[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1993,14(3):135-137. 被引量:9
  • 2刘忠渊,张富春,赵干,钟哲,王宾.手术应激反应的新概念——神经免疫内分泌学说[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1995,16(4):193-195. 被引量:84
  • 3佘守章,吴晓晖.术后疼痛时病人超声心动图的改变[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1989,9(1):19-21. 被引量:13
  • 4[1]Bailey PL,Streisand JB,East KA,et al.Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil.Anesth analg,1990,70:8-15.
  • 5[2]Geller E,Chrubasik J,Graf R,et al.A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural or epidural sufentanil versus intravenous sufentanil or epidural fentanyl analgesia after major abdominal surgery.Anesth analg,1993,76:1243-1250.
  • 6Grass JA, Sakima NT, Schmidt R, et al. A randomized double blind dose reponse comparison of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil analgesia after Cesarean section [J]. Anesth Analg, 1997, 85(2):365~371
  • 7Anand KJS, Phil D, Hickey PR. Halothane-morphine compared with high-dose sufentanil for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac surgery[J]. New EnglJ Med, 1992, 326(1):1~9
  • 8Bailey PL, Streisand JB, East KA, et al. Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil [J]. Anesth Analg, 1990, 70(1):8~15
  • 9Bailey PL. Sufentanil produces shorter lasting respiratory depression and longer lasting analgesia than equipotent doses of fentanyl in human volunteers[J]. Anesthesiolagy, 1986, 65(3A): A493
  • 10De Benedittis G,Lorenzetti A,Migliore M,et al.Postoperative in neurosurgery: a pilotstudy in brain surgery[].Neurosurgery.1996

共引文献336

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部