基于跨学科特质的战略管理研究方法论演化及其本土意义被引量：3

The Evolution of Strategic Management Research Methodology Based on Inter-disciplinal Characteristics and its Significance for Chinese Research

下载PDF

导出

摘要战略管理的学科特质和所研究基本问题的特征,决定了战略研究方法论的演化和完善。研究方法论从实证主义、实在主义,到建构主义日益丰富的演变历程,体现了人们对战略研究学科特质及基本问题认识的逐步深化。建构主义方法论与其它方法论的相互补充,对于深入研究战略管理的情境驱动本质以及战略实践的主体性具有重要意义。 The evolution of the strategy research methodology is determined by the inter-disciplinal characteristics of strategic management and basic research problems.The evolutionary process from Positivism,Realism to Constructivism,has indicated a deepened understanding and recognition of characteristics of strategic management and basic problems.The traditional methodologies,reinforced with constructivism,will be significant for in-depth research of context-driven essence of strategic management and subjectivity of strategic practice.

作者王益民

机构地区山东大学管理学院山东大学社会科学处

出处《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期15-21,7,共8页 Zhejiang Social Sciences

关键词战略管理研究跨学科特质方法论演化建构主义 Strategic Management Research,Inter-Disciplinal Characteristics,Methodology,Evolution,Constructivism

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Balogun, J. , 2003, “Three Responses to the Methodological Challenges of Studying Strategizing” [ J ], Journal of Management Studies, 40 : 197 - 224.
2Foss, N. , 1996,“ Research in Strategy, Economics, and Michael Porter”[ J ], Journal of Management Studies, 33:1-24.
3Godfrey, P. and C. Hill, 1995, “The Problem of Unobservables in Strategic Management Research” [ J ], Strategic Management Journal, 16:519 - 533.
4Jarzabkowski, P. , 2003, “Relevance in Theory and Relevance in Practice: Strategy Theory in Practice” [ J], Aston Working Papers, ISBN No: 1854495283.
5Khanna,T. and K. Palepu, 2000, “Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups” [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 55 : 867 - 891.
6Kogut, B. et al. , 2002, “Agency and Institutions: National divergences in diversification behavior” [ J ], Organization Science, 13 : 162 - 178
7Kuhn, T. , 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [ M], University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
8Mir R, and A. Watson, 2000, “Strategic Management and the Philosophy of Science: the Case for a Constructivist Methodology” [ J], Strategic Management Journal, 21 : 941 - 953.
9Montgomery, C. et al., 1989,“Strategy Content and the Research Process: a Critique and a Commentary” [ J], Strategic Management Journal, 10:189 - 197.
10Powell, T. , 2001, “Competitive Advantage : Logical and Philosophical Considerations” [ J ], Strategic Management Journal, 22 : 875 - 888.