期刊文献+

白内障激光乳化与超声乳化术后角膜内皮变化分析 被引量:1

Changes of corneal epithelium in Er:YAG laser phacoemulsification and ultrasonic phacoemulsification for cataract surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较白内障激光乳化吸出术与超声乳化吸出术对角膜内皮形态、密度及角膜厚度的影响。方法对30例(32眼)白内障行激光乳化及后房型人工晶状体植入术,同期进行30例(35眼)超声乳化及后房型人工晶状体植入术,对术眼角膜内皮细胞损失率、六边形细胞百分率及角膜厚度的变化进行比较。结果术后1周、1个月及3个月,激光乳化组角膜内皮损失率分别为7.56%、5.26%及5.12%,均明显低于超声组的10.31%、11.04%及8.37%;激光组六边形细胞百分率分别为52.49%、53.28%及53.60%,均明显高于超声组的45.30%、46.61%及46.63%;角膜厚度增加率激光组为11.26%、4.91%及2.45%与超声组的12.69%、5.69%及2.92%相比无统计学差别。结论激光乳化术较超声乳化术对角膜内皮损伤更小,安全性更高。 Objective To compare the cornea changes after Er:YAG laser phaeoemulsification and ultrasonic phacoemulsification for cataract surgery. Methods Er:YAG laser was performed on 30 cases (32 eyes) of senile cataract (laser group), ultrasonic phacoemulsifieation was performed on 30 cases (35 eyes) of senile cataract (phaco group) , together with IOL implantation. The loss rate of cornea endothelium, the rates of hexagonal cell and corneal thickness were compared. Results The rates of lost corneal endothclium 1 week,1 month and 3 month post-operatively in laser group were 7.56% , 5.26% and 5.12% respectively; and those in phaco group were 10.31% ,Ⅱ. 04% and 8.37% respectively. The rates of hexagonal cell after operation in laser group were 52.49%, 53.28% and 53.60%, and those in phaco group were 45.30%, 46.61% and 46.63% respectively. The difference of the comeal thickness between the two groups was no statistic significance. Conclusion For cataract extraction, Er:YAG laser emul- sification may be safer than that of ultrasonic phacoemulsification.
出处 《眼外伤职业眼病杂志》 2009年第2期92-96,共5页 Journal of Injuries and Occupational Diseases of the Eye with Ophthalmic Surgeries
关键词 白内障 铒激光乳化 超声乳化 cataract Er: YAG laser phacoemulsification
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Kelman CD. Phacomulisfication and aspiration: a preliminary report [ J]. Am J Ophthalmol 1967,64( 1 ) :23-25.
  • 2李凤鸣.眼科全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.3254-3256.
  • 3Nanevicz TM, Prince MR, Gawande AA, et al. Excimer laser ablation of the lens [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2006, 104 ( 12 ) : 1825-1829.
  • 4Berger JW, Talamo JH, LaMarehe K J, et al. Temperature measurements during phacoemulsification and erbium: YAG laser phacoablation in model systems [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006,22 (3) : 372-378.
  • 5Zaczek A, Zetterstrom C. Posterior capsule opaeification after phacoe mulsification in patients with diabetes mellitus[ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 25(2) :233-237.
  • 6Gailitis RP, Patterson SW, Samueles MA, et al. Comparison of laser phacovaporization using the Er-YAG and the Er-YSGG laser [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003, 111 (5) :679-700.
  • 7Zolotarev MY, Mikhailov BA, Aperovich LI, et al. Dispersion and absorption of liquid water in the infrared and radio region of the spectrum [ J ]. Opt Spectrose 2005, 27 (3) :430-432.
  • 8Stevens GJ. Erbium : YAG laser assisted cataract surgery [ C ]. ARVO meeting 2007 in Ft Lauderdal.
  • 9Colard DM, Continuous curilinear capsulotomy using on intraocualar Erbium laser fiberoptic delivery system [ C ]. Ocular Surgery News 2004, September 15.
  • 10Olson PJ, Crandall AS. Silicon versus polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses with regard to capsular opacification [ J ]. Ophthalmic Surg Laser,2006,29( 1 ) :55-58.

二级参考文献3

共引文献134

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部