摘要
目的评价小切口开放手术与输尿管镜气压弹道碎石(URSL)处理输尿管上段结石的优缺点。方法回顾性分析输尿管上段结石采用小切口开放手术20例与URSL术22例作比较。结果小切口开放手术组手术成功率高、并发症少,明显优于URSL,而术中出血、住院时间则明显超过URSL组。结论小切口开放手术治疗输尿管上段结石更适合基层医院开展。
Objective To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of open operation with small incision and transureteroscopie pneumatic lithotripsy in treatment of proximal ureteral calculus. Methods 42 cases with proximal ureteral calculus were studied retrospectively ,20 with small incision operation and 22 cases with transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. Results The success rate of small incision operation was higher and complication was less than that of transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. While the blood loss was more and the length of stay was longer than that of transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.Conelusion Small incision open operationwas suitable for proximal ureteral calculus in relatively small hospital.
出处
《当代医学》
2009年第3期10-11,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
输尿管上段结石
开放手术
URSL
Open operation
Transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy
Proximal ureteral calculus
