期刊文献+

猪半体内氟苯尼考对大肠杆菌的药动学-药效学同步关系研究 被引量:10

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Integration of Florfenicol against E.coli in Pigs ex vivo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用体内药动学和体外药效学联合的方法,研究氟苯尼考在猪半体内抗大肠杆菌的活性,为合理应用氟苯尼考治疗猪大肠杆菌病提供参考。氟苯尼考在MH肉汤及血清中对猪大肠杆菌的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)分别为3.25和8.75μg.mL-1。猪按20 mg.kg-1的剂量肌内注射氟苯尼考后,药物吸收缓慢且不规则,血浆药物达峰时间为(3.60±1.52)h,峰浓度为(5.28±1.48)μg.mL-1。氟苯尼考在猪体内消除缓慢,体内平均滞留时间为(26.61±9.81)h,消除半衰期为(17.49±8.04)h。半效浓度参数(EC50)为(7.76±4.53)h。AUC0→24h/MIC为(7.69±1.48)h,Cmax/MIC为(0.60±0.17)。由于大肠杆菌对氟苯尼考的敏感性较差和氟苯尼考肌内注射药动学特征的限制,应用氟苯尼考,按照常规方案治疗猪大肠杆菌病,可能导致治疗失败。 For the rational usage of florfenicol to treat the colibacillosis of pigs,the integration of pharmacokinetics in vivo and pharmacodynamics in vitro was used to study the antibacterial activity of {lorfenicol against E. coli in pig serum ex vivo. The accurate MIC of florfenicol against E. coli in MH broth and serum was 3.25 and 8. 75μg[mL^-1, respectively. Florfenicol was absorbed slowly and anomaly in pigs after intramuscular administration(20 mg·kg^-1). The Cmax was (5.28±1.48) μg · mL^-1 at (3.60±1.52) h. The elimination of florfenicol was slow in pigs. Mean residence time(MRT) was (26.61± 9.81) h. Elimination half-life(t1/2β) was (17.49±8.04) h. EC50 was (7.76±4.53) h. AUC0→24/MIC was (7.69±1.48) h and Cmax/MIC was (0.60 ±0.17). Because of the poor activity of florfenicol against E. coli and the lower plasma Cmax Of florfenicol in pigs, it may fail to get desirable treatment result when curing the infection of E. coli in pigs by the routine regimen.
出处 《畜牧兽医学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期243-247,共5页 ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA
基金 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(06105470)
关键词 氟苯尼考 药动学-药效学同步关系 大肠杆菌 半体内 florfenicol pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics intergration pigs E. coli ex vivo
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献87

  • 1严更生.猪呼吸道疾病综合征的控制对策[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2004,20(8):41-41. 被引量:1
  • 2邱银生,吴佳.兽用广谱抗菌药物氟甲砜霉素[J].中国兽药杂志,1996,30(2):47-48. 被引量:53
  • 3叶秀珊 卢光志.氯霉素在猪体内代谢动力学的研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1985,6(1):42-45.
  • 4刘昌孝 郑惠芬 资佑明.抗菌增效剂DVD和OMP与TMP药物代谢动力学的比较研究[J].药学通报,1985,20:413-414.
  • 5徐苏云 等.药理实验方法学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.1647-1670.
  • 6Gover AU. Impact of the antibiotic dosage schedule on efficacy in experiment softt tissue infection[J]. Scan J Infect Dis,1990,74. (suppl):147.
  • 7James JK, Palmer SM, Levin DP, et al. Comparison if convientional dosing verse continuous-infusion vaneomycin therapy for patients with suspected or documented gram-positive infections [ J]. Antimicobial Agents Chemother,1996,40 : 696.
  • 8Tumidge JD, Gudmundsson S, Vogelman B, et al. The postantibiotic effect of antifungal agents against common pathogenic yeasts[J]. Journal of Antimicobial Chemother, 1994,34 : 83.
  • 9Meibohm B, Derendorf H. Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/phamacodynamic(PK/PD) modeling[J], Int J Clinical Phamaco Therapeutics. 1997,35(10):401.
  • 10Vogelrnan B, Gudmundsson S, Leggett J, et al. Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model[J]. J Infect Dis, 1988,158:831-847.

共引文献101

同被引文献127

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部