业界利益与公共福利双赢：美国医学会与药品管理的联邦化(1891-1912) 被引量：6

A Win-win Situation for Professional Interests and Public Welfare:the American Medical Association and the Federalization of Drug Administration(1891-1912)

原文传递

导出

摘要 1891年,以参议院讨论的第一道纯净食品和药品综合议案为契机,美国医学会开始介入政府的药品管理。1901年的"机制性"改组是重要的分水岭,美国医学会逐步发展为强大的"医学政治组织"。它通过内部动员,借助《美国医学会杂志》制造社会舆论,外联妇女组织、"黑幕揭发者"以及官僚机构,以多种方式敦促国会颁布了《纯净食品和药品法》和《谢利修正案》,管理国内药品的掺假和贴假商标,规制专利药品制造及贸易。美国医学会与联邦政府的互动、合作优化了转型年代国家与社会的关系,美国医学会也藉对公共卫生事务的参与最终实现了业界利益与公共福利的双赢。 The Senate's consideration of the first general pure food and drug bill in 1891 marks the moment when the American Medical Association(AMA) began to be involved in government drug administration.Its institutional reorganization in 1901 served as a watershed;thereafter it gradually developed into a powerful 'medico-political organization.' The AMA pressed Congress to enact appropriate legislation through internal mobilization and the use of the Journal of the American Medical Association to form public opinion on the one hand,and through liaison with women's organizations,muckrakers,and bureaucratic bodies on the other.The Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the Sherley Amendment of 1912 were intended to govern drug adulteration and mislabeling within the country and to regulate the manufacture of and trade in patent medicines.Interaction and cooperation between the AMA and the Federal government optimized state-society relations in an era of change.The AMA ultimately achieved a win-win situation for professional interests and public welfare through its participation in public health matters.

作者张勇安

机构地区上海大学历史系副教授

出处《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期134-154,共21页 Historical Research

基金上海市哲社规划课题(项目编号2006BLS003)的阶段性成果上海市教委重点学科(J50106)的资助

关键词美国医学会查尔斯·里德哈维·威利《纯净食品和药品法》

分类号 F203 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献184

1Oscar E. Anderson, Jr., The Health of a Nation: Harvey W. Wiley and the Fight for Pure Food, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
2James H. Young, The Toadstool Millionaires: A Social History of Patent Medicines in America before Federal Regulation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.
3James H. Young, The Medical Messiahs: A Social History of Health Quackery in Twentieth-Century America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.
4James H. Young, Pure Food: Securing the Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989.
5Clayton A. Coppin and Jack C. High, The Politics of Purity: Harvey Washington Wiley and the Origins of Federal Food Policy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
6James H. Cassedy, “Muckraking and Medicine: Samuel Hopkins Adams,” American Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 1 (Spring 1964), pp. 85-99.
7Arlene Finger Kantor, "Upton Sinclair and the Pure Food and Drugs Act of 1906," American Journal of Public Health, vol. 66, no. 12 (December 1976), pp. 1202-1205.
8Lorine S. Goodwin, The Pure Food, Drink, and Drug Crusaders, 1879-1914, Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 1999.
9Ilyse Barkan, “Industry Invites Regulation: The Passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906,”American Journal of Public Health, vol. 75, no. 1 (January 1985), pp. 18-26.
10Donna J. Wood, “The Strategic Use of Public Policy: Business Support for the 1906 Food and Drug Act,” Business History Review, vol. 59, no. 3 (Autumn 1985), pp. 403-432.