6Verlooy J, De Smedt K,Selosse P.Failme of a modified poste-rior lumbar interbody fusion technique to produce adequate pain relief in isthmie spondylolytie grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients[J].Spine, 1993,18(11) : 1491-1495.
7Suk S,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter-bodv fusion to pediele screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spnndylolisthesis [J].Spine, 1997,22 (2) : 210-220.
8Schlegel KF,Pon A,Biomechanics of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis[J].Clin Orthop, 1985,193:115-119.
9Madan S, Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior interbodv fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spond?,lolytie spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 2002,27 ( 14 ) : 1536-1542.
10Nork SE,Hu SS,Workrnan KI,et al. Patient outcome after de-compression and instrumented posterior spinal Iusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine. 1999,24(6) :561-569.
6Kanayama M, Cunnigham BW, Sefter JC, et aI. Does spi hal instrumentation influence the healing process of pos terolateral spinal fusion An in vivo animal model [J] Spine,1999,24(11):1058-1065.
7.Schnake K J, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilizationin addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Spine, 2009, 31 ( 4 ) : 442.
8Lowe T G, Tahernia A D. Unilateral transforaminal posteri- or lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Clin Orthop, 2010, 11(3) : 64.
9Scifert J L, Sairyo K, Goel V K, et al. Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing txsterior fixation device and its e- quivalent conventional device in a calf spine mode[J]. Spine, 2010, 24(21): 2206.
10SAKAURA H, YAMASHITA T,MIWA T, et al. Outcomes of 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis [J]. Neurosurg Spine, 2013, 19 ( 1 ) : 90- 94.
