期刊文献+

脑损伤患者听觉P300电位特点 被引量:7

Auditory P300 in the Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨听觉P300电位对脑损伤患者认知功能障碍程度法医学评价的应用价值。方法对正常人和脑损伤患者,分别在主动(踩踏板)与被动任务状态下进行听觉P300测试。结果正常人主动任务状态P300电位中的N2、P3波波幅较被动状态高,潜伏期无明显延长,N1、P2波幅Cz点高于Pz点。脑损伤组被动任务状态下N2、P3波波幅较正常人被动状态下高,且潜伏期延长。脑损伤组主动任务状态P300电位中的N2、P3波波幅较被动状态高,且潜伏期延长。注意障碍患者P3波潜伏期改变最明显。结论任务类型主要影响N2、P3波幅。被动反应中的N2、P3潜伏期可作为评价脑损伤患者认知功能的指标。 Objective To assess the cognitive dysfunction in patients with the traumatic brain injury(TBI) by auditory P300. Methods Auditory P300 was recorded in the normal subjects and patients with TBI at the active(foot pedal) and passive task. Results In healthy persons, N2 and P3 in active task state showed higher amplitude than that in passive task state, and no significant prolongation of the latency. The amplitude of N1 and P2 at Cz was higher than that at Pz. In passive task state, N2 and P3 showed higher amplitude and longer latency in the patients than that in the heahhy persons. N2 and P3 of the patients in the active task showed higher amplitude and longer latency than that in the passive task. Obvious change of P3 latency was observed in the patients with attention disorder. Conclusion The type of task mainly affect the amplitude of N2 and P3. The latency of N2 and P3 in passive task can be used as an indication for evaluating cognitive function in patients with diffuse brain injury.
出处 《法医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2009年第1期19-23,共5页 Journal of Forensic Medicine
基金 沈阳市科学技术计划项目(1081267-9-00)
关键词 法医学 事件相关电位 P300 脑损伤 认知 forensic medicine event-related potentials, P300 brain injuries cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Polich J, Criado JR. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b[J]. Int J Psychophysiol,2006, 60(2) : 172-185.
  • 2梁勇,王正敏.听觉事件相关电位P300的主动与被动模式记录比较[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2000,14(7):296-298. 被引量:8
  • 3Wronka E, Kuniecki M, Kaiser J, et al. The P3 produced by auditory stimuli presented in a passive and active condition: modulation by visual stimuli[J]. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 2007,67 (2) : 155-164.
  • 4Alberti A, Sarchielli P, Mazzotta G, et al. Event-related potentials in posttraumatic headache[J]. Headache, 2001,41 (6):579-585.
  • 5邓炳海,吴宗耀,侯岷,王汝兰,张超.昏迷患者P300电位的改变[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2000,22(3):177-178. 被引量:3
  • 6寇振芬,穆俊林,孙敏,秦志华,梁位流.颅外伤所致精神障碍患者的P_(300)电位研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(4):334-335. 被引量:5
  • 7Oknina LB, Sharova EV, Georgievskaia NA, et al. Dynamics of P300 component of acoustic evoked potential in postraumatic unconsciousness[J]. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova,2006,56(6):757-766.
  • 8Frodl T, Meisenzahl EM MUller D, et al. P300 subcomponents and clinical symptoms in schizophrenia[J]. Int J Psychophysiol, 2002,43 (3) : 237-246.
  • 9Ardila A, Moreno S. Neuropsychologieal test performance in Aruaco Indians: an exploratory study[J]. J Int Neuropsychol Soc,2001,7(4):510-515.
  • 10Stadler W, Klimesch W, Pouthas V, et al. Differential effects of the stimulus sequence on CNV and P300[J]. Brain Res, 2006,1123 ( 1 ) : 157-167.

二级参考文献15

  • 1王长虹,李晏,潘苗,王来海,马建东,穆俊林.利培酮氯丙嗪对首发精神分裂症患者认知功能及事件相关电位P_(300)的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(5):405-407. 被引量:25
  • 2穆俊林,孙敏,陈兴时,寇振芬,马建东.精神分裂症患者责任能力与P_(300)电位及人格因素的关系[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(10):901-902. 被引量:5
  • 3张明岛 陈兴时.脑诱发电位学(第2版)[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1997.265-266.
  • 4中华医学会精神科学会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第3版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.75-82.
  • 5Lang A H,Ear Hear,1995年,16卷,118页
  • 6吴在德 主编.外科学.第5版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.964-966.
  • 7Cossa FM,Fubiani M.Attention in closed head injury:a critical review.Ital J Neurolsci,1999,20:145-153.
  • 8Levin HS.Neurobehavioral outcome of closed head injury:implications.J Neurotrauma,1995,12:604-610.
  • 9王绪襄,廖文满.颅脑外伤.成都:四川科技出版社,1995.309.
  • 10Polich J,Herbst KL.P300 as a clinical assay:rationale,evaluation and findings.Int J Psychophysiol,2000,38:3-19.

共引文献12

同被引文献96

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部