期刊文献+

老年人非瓣膜病心房颤动患者华法林5mg起始治疗的有效性及安全性 被引量:7

Effectivenesst and safety of 5 mg/d warfarin initial therapy in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨老年人非瓣膜病心房颤动(NVAF)患者应用华法林5 mg起始治疗的疗效及安全性。方法入选具有华法林抗凝适应证的NVAF老年患者91例,随机分为2组,分别以5 mg/d或3 mg/d起始治疗,于治疗前、治疗后第3、4、5、8天测定国际标准化比值(INR),根据INR调整服药剂量,至INR稳定。结果 5 mg/d起始治疗第3、4、5、8天INR的达标率分别为3.9%、29.4%、43.1%和72.5%,INR达稳定时间为(9.8±2.3)d,与3 mg/d组0%、5%、22.5%、50%[(12.5±2.7)d]比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),出血发生率两组差异无统计学意义。结论 5 mg/d起始,连续4 d的华法林起始治疗方案能使INR迅速、安全、有效地达到稳定,无严重出血并发症发生。 Objective To evaluate the effects and safety of 5mg/d warfarin initial Therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods A total of 91 patients who had the indication of anticoagulation therapy were randomly assigned to either 3mg/d or 5mg/d initial dosage warfarin therapy group. International normalized ration (INR) was determined before and 3, 4, 5 and 8 days after warfarin therapy. The dosage of warfarin was adjusted according to the 1NR results until it was stable to 1.8 to 2.4 ( target INR). Results The rates of reaching target 1NR in 5 mg/d group and 3 mg/d group were 3.9% vs. 0% at day 3, 29. 4% vs. 5% at day 4, 43. 1% 22. 5% at day 5 and 72. 5% vs. 50% at day 8, respectively (all P 〈0. 05). Compared with 3 mg/d group [ ( 12. 5 -±2.3) d], the time to target INR was significantly shorter in 5 mg/d group [ (9. 8 ± 2. 3 ) d, P 〈 0. 05 ]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the 2 groups ( 13.7% in 5 mg/d group vs. 10% in 3 mg/d group, P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Compared with 3 mg/d initial therapy, 5 mg/d initial therapy with warfarin can reach the target INR more quickly, without increasing the severe bleeding complications.
出处 《中国心血管杂志》 2009年第1期31-33,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 心房颤动 华法林 国际标准化比 Atrial fibrillation Warfarin International normalized ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1胡大一,周自强,陈捷,张仁汉,李奎宝,赵秀丽.中国心房颤动现状流行病学研究[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2004(z1):3-6. 被引量:32
  • 2Olsson SB, Executive Steering Committee of the SPORTIF Ⅲ Investigators. Stroke prevention with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with warfarin in patients with non - valvular atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF Ⅲ): randomised controlled trial. Lancet ,2003,362 : 1691-1698.
  • 3Albers GW, Diener HC, FrisonL, et al. Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvularalrial fibrillation. A randomized triM. JAMA,2005,293:690-698.
  • 4Wallentin L, Ezekowitz M, Simmers TA, et al. PETRO - investigators. Safety and efficacy of a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in atrial fibrillation:a dose finding trial with comparison to warfarin. Eur Heart J, 2005,26:482.
  • 5孙艺红,胡大一.华法林对中国人心房颤动患者抗栓的安全性和有效性研究[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(4):258-260. 被引量:170
  • 6Van Walraven C, Hart RG, Singer DE, et al. Oral anticoagulants vs. aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-an individual patient meta - analysis. JAMA,2002,288:2441-2448.
  • 7Roberts GW, Gallus AS, Druskeit T, et al. Comparision of an age adjusted warfarin loading protocol with empirical dosing and Fenhetty's protocol. Aust NZ J Med, 1999,29:731-736.
  • 8Eckhoff CD, Didomenico RJ, Shapiro NL. Initiating warfarin therapy: 5 mg versus 10 mg. Ann Pharmacother, 2004, 38: 2115-2121.
  • 9Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J, et al. American heart Association/ American College of Cardiology Foundation. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2003,41:1633-1652.

二级参考文献22

  • 1[13]Friberg J, Scharling H. Sex-specific increase in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (The Copenhagen City Heart Study) [ J]. Am J Cardiol, 2003,92:1 419
  • 2[1]Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, et al. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort: the Framingham Heart Study[ J]. JAMA, 1994,271:840
  • 3[2]Ostranderld JR, Brandt RL, Kjelsberg MO, et al. Electrocardiographic findings among the adult population of a total natural community, Tecumseh, Michigan[J]. Circulation,1965,31:888
  • 4[3]Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, et al. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation:Analysis and imphcations[J]. Arch Intern Med, 1995,155:469
  • 5[4]Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study [ J ]. Stroke,1991,22:983
  • 6[5]Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects ( the Cardiovascular Health Study) [ J ].Am J Cardiol, 1994,74:236
  • 7[6]Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects ( the Cardiovascular Health Study) [ J].Am J Cardiol , 1994,74:236
  • 8[7]Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, et al. Coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Study [ J ]. Am Heart J,1983,106:389
  • 9[8]Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study [ J ]. Stroke,1991,22:983
  • 10[9]Kopecky SL, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, et al. The natural history of lone atrial fibrillation: A population-based study over three decades [J]. N Engl J Med,1987 ,317 :669

共引文献199

同被引文献31

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部