1Diener E. Subjective well - being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984; 95 (3): 542-575.
2Brickman P, Campbell DT. Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: Appley MH. Adaptation - level theory: A symposium. New York: Academic Press, 1971.287 - 305.
3Oswald AJ. Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 1997; 107:1815 - 1831.
4Diener E, Suh E. Age and Subjective Well - being: An International Analysis, in Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 1998; Vol. 17.
5Wallis C. The New Science of Happiness. Time, 2005; January 17, 144 - 148.
6Wood JV. What is social comparison and how should we study it? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996; 22: 5202537.
7Fujita F. An investigation of the relation between extraversion, neuroticism, positive affect, and negative affect. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champign, 1991. 114-192.
8Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN. Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revisions to the adaptation theory of well - being. American Psychologist, 2006; 61, 305-314.
9Bradburn NM. The Structure of Psychological Well - being. Chicago: aldine. 1969.
10Kozma A. Stones MJ. The measurement of happiness: development of the memorial university Newfoundland scale of happiness. Journal of Gerontology, 1980; 35 (6) : 906 - 917.
