摘要
目的:探讨成人素质希望量表的信度和效度。方法:用成人素质希望量表调查410名学生,评定该量表的内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度和效标效度。结果:①量表总分及两个因子的Cronbachα系数均达0.70以上,重测信度系数为0.86;②验证性因素分析支持原有模型,RMSEA=0.098,SRMR=0.060,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.91,NNFI=0.85;③希望量表总分与积极应对方式呈正相关r=0.47,与消极应对方式呈负相关r=-0.27;与满意度呈显著正相关r=0.47(均P<0.01);④希望存在受教育程度间的差异(F=7.31,P<0.001),大学生的希望水平显著高于高中生,希望水平的性别差异不显著。结论:希望量表可用于评定我国学生的希望水平。
Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of Hope Scale. Methods: 410 students were administrated Hope Scale. The internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity were examined; Results: (1)The Cronbach α coefficients were larger than 0.7, and the retest coefficients were 0.86; (2)Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit between the data and the construct of scale,RMSEA=0.098,SRMR=0.060, GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.91 ,NNFI= 0.85 ; (3)he total score of Hope Scale was significantly positively correlated with positive coping styles (r=-0.47) and negatively correlated with negative coping styles (r=-0.27); (4)There was significant difference in education level (F=7.31,P〈 0.001) in hope, no difference in sex. Conclusion : The Hope Scale could be used to assess the hope of Chinese students.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2009年第1期24-26,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2006年度重大项目
心理分析技术与学校心理教育应用研究(06JJD880021)
关键词
希望
学生
信度
效度
横断面研究
Hope
Students
Reliability
Validity
Cross-sectional study