期刊文献+

成人素质希望量表的信效度检验 被引量:114

Reliability and Validity of Adult Dispositional Hope Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨成人素质希望量表的信度和效度。方法:用成人素质希望量表调查410名学生,评定该量表的内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度和效标效度。结果:①量表总分及两个因子的Cronbachα系数均达0.70以上,重测信度系数为0.86;②验证性因素分析支持原有模型,RMSEA=0.098,SRMR=0.060,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.91,NNFI=0.85;③希望量表总分与积极应对方式呈正相关r=0.47,与消极应对方式呈负相关r=-0.27;与满意度呈显著正相关r=0.47(均P<0.01);④希望存在受教育程度间的差异(F=7.31,P<0.001),大学生的希望水平显著高于高中生,希望水平的性别差异不显著。结论:希望量表可用于评定我国学生的希望水平。 Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of Hope Scale. Methods: 410 students were administrated Hope Scale. The internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity were examined; Results: (1)The Cronbach α coefficients were larger than 0.7, and the retest coefficients were 0.86; (2)Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit between the data and the construct of scale,RMSEA=0.098,SRMR=0.060, GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.91 ,NNFI= 0.85 ; (3)he total score of Hope Scale was significantly positively correlated with positive coping styles (r=-0.47) and negatively correlated with negative coping styles (r=-0.27); (4)There was significant difference in education level (F=7.31,P〈 0.001) in hope, no difference in sex. Conclusion : The Hope Scale could be used to assess the hope of Chinese students.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2009年第1期24-26,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2006年度重大项目 心理分析技术与学校心理教育应用研究(06JJD880021)
关键词 希望 学生 信度 效度 横断面研究 Hope Students Reliability Validity Cross-sectional study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Snyder CR, Lopez SJ. Positive psychology, the Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths. Sage Publications, 2006. 189-191
  • 2Snyder CR. Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling and Development, 1995, 73(3):355- 340
  • 3Feldman DB, Snyder CR. Hope and the meaningful life: Theoretical and empirical associations between goals directed thinking and life meaning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2005, 24(3):401-421
  • 4Cheavens JS, Feldman DB, Woodward JT, et al. Hope in cognitive psychotherapies: On working with client strengths. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2006, 20(2):135-145
  • 5Arnau RC, Rosen D, Finch JF, et al. Longitudinal effects of hope on depression and anxiety: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Personality, 2007, 2:43- 63
  • 6Bailey TC, Snyder CR. Satisfaction with life and hope: A look at age and marital status. The Psychological Record, 2007, 57(2) : 233-240
  • 7Michael F, Valle E, Huebner S, et al. An analysis of hope as a psychological strength. Journal of School Psychology, 2006, 44: 393-406
  • 8汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定手册增订版.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12:82,122-124
  • 9Fan'an C J, Herth KA, Popovich JM. Hope and hopelessness, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,1995. 189-191
  • 10罗伟,孙雅娜,王滨.大学生生活事件、应对方式和主观幸福感之间的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(4):405-406. 被引量:49

二级参考文献19

  • 1段建华.主观幸福感概述[J].心理科学进展,1996,6(1):46-51. 被引量:365
  • 2钟霞,姜乾金,钱丽菊,吴志霞.医务人员压力反应与社会支持、生活事件、应对方式的相关研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):70-72. 被引量:94
  • 3李幼穗,吉楠.主观幸福感研究的新进展[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006,26(2):70-74. 被引量:81
  • 4岳颂华,张卫,黄红清,李董平.青少年主观幸福感、心理健康及其与应对方式的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):93-98. 被引量:117
  • 5张雨新 王燕.归因方式和抑郁[J].心理学报,1989,21(2):141-147.
  • 6汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 7Scheier MF,Carver CS.Optimism,coping and health:Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology,1985,4:219-247
  • 8Chang EC.Optimism and pessimism:Implications for theory,research,and practice.Washington,DC:American Psychological Association,2001.191
  • 9Scheier MF,Carver CS,Bridges MW.Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety,self-mastery,and self-esteem):A reevaluation of the Life Orientaion Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67:1063-1078
  • 10Diener WN,Emmons RA,Larsen RJ,et al.The Satisfaction With Life Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment,1985,49:71-75

共引文献75

同被引文献1189

引证文献114

二级引证文献775

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部