期刊文献+

长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效观察 被引量:3

Clinical Effect Vinorebine and Cisplatin in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察国产长春瑞滨(NVB)联合顺铂(DDP)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法52例晚期NSCLC中男37例,女15例;鳞癌35例,腺癌17例;ⅢA期9例,ⅢB期15例,Ⅳ期28例;初治42例,复治10例;采用长春瑞滨(NVB)25mg/m2第1,8天静滴;顺铂(DDP)25mg/m2,第1~3天静滴,21d为一周期。结果完全缓解(CR)1例,部分缓解(PR)20例,稳定(SD)27例,进展(PD)4例,总有效率为40.4%。中位疾病进展时间5.6个月,中位生存期11个月,一年生存率46.2%。主要毒副反应为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度骨髓抑制53.8%(28/52),恶心、呕吐发生率为30.8%,其次为静脉炎,发生率11.5%。结论NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC疗效确切,毒副反应可耐受,价格相对便宜,为符合我国国情的治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的方案。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Vinorelbine combined with Cisplatin(NP regimen) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In 52 patients with advanced NSCLC, there were 35 with squamous carcinoma, 17 with lung adenocarcinoma,37 males and 15 females,9 patients with stage ⅢA disease, 15 patients with stage Ⅲ B disease and 28 patients with stage Ⅳ. 42 patients had no prior chemotherapy and 10 patients received previous chemotherapy. NVB 25 mg/m^2, d1, d8;cisplatin 25 mg/m^2, d 1-3 ;21 days was a cycle. Results Partial response was observed in 20 cases, noresponse in 27 cases and progression in 4 cases. The overall response rate was 40.4%. Median time to progression(TTP) was 5.6 months. Median survival duration was 11 months, one year survival rate was 46.2%. The main toxicities were grade Ⅰ - Ⅱ myelosuppression 53.8% ,nausea and vomiting were observed in 30.8% ,phlebitis,in 11.5%. Conclusion The results indicate NP regimen for advanced NSCLC is promise, the toxicities was mild and tolerable.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2009年第3期238-239,共2页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
关键词 非小细胞肺肿瘤 晚期 长春瑞滨 顺铂 化疗 Advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer Vinorelbine Cisplatin Chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1苏同义,朱严冰,倪海英,孟冀昌,张怡梅.NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌34例临床观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2004,9(3):272-274. 被引量:7
  • 2张载福 王迪浔.炎症介质.病理生理学(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.109-12.
  • 3杨永年 朱宝荣.肾上腺皮质激素在内科疾病中的应用.上海医科大学实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.2376-2376.
  • 4Bunn PA, Soriano AF. Chemotherapeutic options in lung cancer [J]. Cancer, 1998,33(8):1740.
  • 5Le Chevalier T, Brisgand D, Soria JC, et al. Long term analysis of survival in the European randomized trial comparing vinorelbine/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin and vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Oncologist, 2001, 61:811.
  • 6[1]Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG); Advisory Committee on Collaboration with Industry in Medical Education of the European School of Oncology (ESO); Vienna Medical Association, Consensus on medical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer,2002,38(Suppl 3)∶S3-S7.
  • 7[3]Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Lichter AS, et al eds. Clinical Oncology 2 ed. Singapore: HARCOURT ASIA,1999.1423-1426.
  • 8[4]Hansen HH eds. Textbook of lung cancer. 1ed. London: Martin Dunitz,2000.230-233.
  • 9[5]Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol,2000,18(12)∶2354-2362.
  • 10[8]Kelly K, Bunn PA Jr. Is it time to reevaluate our approach to the treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer,1998,20(2)∶85-91.

共引文献709

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部