期刊文献+

冠状动脉造影术后血管缝合器应用的临床评价 被引量:2

A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF VESSEL SUTURING APPARATUS AFTER CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨冠状动脉造影术(CAG)后病人股动脉穿刺部位应用血管缝合器止血的安全性和有效性。方法对576例经股动脉行CAG病人进行前瞻性研究,所有病人术前均接受拜阿司匹林、波立维,术后接受低分子肝素治疗;随机分为两组,缝合器组(267例)在完成CAG后立即拔除股动脉鞘管,选用血管缝合器止血,压迫组(309例)在CAG术后拔除鞘管采用压迫止血。结果除在血栓形成以及动静脉瘘或假性动脉瘤方面外,缝合器组病人的主要血管并发症低于压迫组,差异均有显著性(χ2=6.63~15.23,P<0.05);而且,缝合器组病人的止血时间及卧床时间均短于压迫组,差异亦有显著性(t′=-58.08、-56.26,P<0.05)。结论应用血管缝合器是一种迅速、有效的止血方法,能明显缩短病人止血时间和卧床时间,降低血管并发症发生率,提高病人的舒适度,值得临床上推广应用。 Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of hemostasis on puncture site of femoral artery by using vessel suturing apparatus (VSA) after coronary arteriography (CAG). Methods A prospective study was done in 576 patients undergoing CAG. All the patients received aspirin, clopidogrel and low molecular heparin before the CAG and were divided into two groups in random. VSA group (267 cases) : VSA was applied once the sheathing canal was removed from femoral artery; and compression group (309 cases) : by manual compression instead of VSA. Results The main vascular complications in VSA group were fewer than compression group, except thrombogenesis and arteriovenous fistula or false aneurysm (χ^2 = 6.63-15. 23, P〈 0.05). The duration of hemostasis and lying in bed was shorter in VSA group (t′=58.08, --56.26;P〈0.05). Conclusion The use of VSA is a fast and effective method for hemostasis, it can shorten the time to stop bleeding and bed rest, reduce vascular complications and raise the degree of comfort of patients after CAG.
出处 《青岛大学医学院学报》 CAS 2009年第1期54-56,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis
关键词 血管缝合器 股动脉 冠状动脉造影术 并发症 Vessel suturing apparatus Femoral artery Coronary arteriography Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1彭文华,王勇,曾玉杰,李宪伦,柯元南.临床论著经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后应用第三代PerClose血管缝合器的初步[J].中日友好医院学报,2005,19(5):259-261. 被引量:2
  • 2HEINZEN M P, STIRAUER B E. Peripheral arterial compli cations after heart catheterization[J]. Herz, 1998,23 - 4 20.
  • 3NASSER T K, MOHLER E R, WILENSKY R L, et al. Peripheral vascular complications following coronary interven- tional procedures[J]. Clin Cardiol, 1995,18(11) :609-614.
  • 4惠海鹏 许顶立 侯玉清.冠状动脉造影术后并发急性肺栓塞和右股深静脉血栓各1例[J].临床心血管病杂志,2000,16(5):202-202.
  • 5KORNOWSKI R, BRANDES S, TEPLITSKY I, et al. Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial sutring device following percutaneous coronary intervertions: a pilot evalution [J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2002,14 :741-745.
  • 6BLANE R, MOUNAYER C, PIOTIN M, et al. Hemostatic closure device after carotid punture for stent and coil placement in an intracranial aneurysm: technical nate[J]. AJNR Am J Euroradiol, 2002,23(6) :978-981.
  • 7SHRAKE K L. Comparison of major complication rates associated with four methods of arterial closure[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2000, 85 : 1024-1025.
  • 8DANGAS G, MEHRAN R, KOKOLIS S, et al. Vascular complications after pereutaneous coronary interventions fol- lowing hemostasis with manualcompression versus arteriotomy closure devicesl[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001,38(3):638- 641.
  • 9KORENY M, RIEDMULLER E, NIKFARDJAM M, et al. Arterial puncture dosing devices compared with standard man ual compression after cardiac catheterrization: systematic review and meta analysis[J]. JAMA, 2004,291(3):350-371.
  • 10侯磊,周可,徐建刚,李伟明,陈艳清,徐亚伟.冠状动脉造影和治疗术后应用血管缝合器的研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(1):65-65. 被引量:7

二级参考文献5

  • 1Abando A,Hood D,Weaver F,et al.The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure [J].J Vasc Surg,2004,40: 287-290.
  • 2Nasu K,Tsuchikane E,Sumitsuji S,et al.The safety and efficacy of "pre-closure" utilizing the Closer suture-mediated vascular closure device for achievement of hemostasis in patients following coronary interventions:results of the second Perclose Accelerated Ambulation and Discharge (PARADISE Ⅱ) Trial[J].J Invasive Cardiol, 2005,17 ( 1 ): 30-33.
  • 3Nikolsky E,Mehran R,Halkin A,et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures:a meta-analysis[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44(6) : 1200-1209.
  • 4Quinn SF,Kim J.Percutaneous femoral closure following stent-graft placement:use of the Perclose device[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2004,27(3):231-236.
  • 5Tiesenhausen K,Tomka M,Allmayer T,et al. Femoral artery infection associated with a percutaneous arterial suture device[J] .Vasa, 2004,33 (2): 83-85.

共引文献35

同被引文献12

  • 1徐日新,顾翔,刘晓东,屠莉莉,谢勇,陈述,张薏.经皮血管封堵器在冠状动脉介入中的应用体会(附70例报告)[J].中国医师杂志,2005,7(12):1700-1701. 被引量:3
  • 2杨春梅,谢丰,黄毅雄,钟彩芳.PCI术后应用血管闭合器的护理观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(10):115-116. 被引量:4
  • 3陈华丽.血管封堵器在冠脉介入治疗中的临床应用[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(12):76-77. 被引量:2
  • 4Ratnam LA,Raja J,Munneke GJ,et al.Prospective nonrandomi-zed trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and StarClose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures[J].Cardio-vasc Intervent Radiol,2007,30(2):182-188.
  • 5Ikeno F,Sadoughi MA,Lyons JK,et al.Arteriotomy closure dev-ice application following percutaneous coronary intervention may prevent bleeding complications in patients with acute myo-cardial infarction[J].Int J Cardiol,2007,117(1):131-132.
  • 6Nikolsky E,Mehran R,Halkin A,et al.Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients under-going percutaneous coronary procedures:a meta-analysis[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44(6):1200-1209.
  • 7Deuling JH,Vermeulen RP,Anthonio RA,et al.Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization:a comparison of An-gio-Seal,StarClose,and manual compression[J].Catheter Card-iovasc Interv,2008,71(4):518-523.
  • 8Engelbert TL,Scholten A,Thompson K,et al.Early ambulation after percutaneous femoral access with use of closure devices and hemostatic agents[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2010,24(4):518-523.
  • 9Imam A,Carter RM,Phillips-Hughes J,et al.StarClose vascular closure device:prospective study on 222 deployments in an in-terventional radiology practice[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2007,30(4):738-742.
  • 10姜琳.冠脉介入术后封堵器和常规加压止血的比较[J].中国民康医学,2008,20(21):2477-2477. 被引量:3

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部