摘要
陈寿撰《三国志》,以《蜀书》的名义记述刘备、刘禅的"汉"政权,这有其特殊原因;今天,则应名从主人地称"汉",或者沿用旧称地称"季汉",底线是约定俗成地称"蜀汉"。又余明侠著《诸葛亮评传》,在资料的去伪存真、思与行的有机结合、思想的发覆阐微、生平的考辨求实、以史证文而还诸葛亮以本来面目等方面,为尤其值得肯定者。
In his book The Records of the Three Kingdoms, Chen Shou narrated Han regime of Liu Bei and Liu Shan in the name of the book. There was some special reason for this. Today, we call it Han from the host name, or Ji-Han from old callings, or Shu-Han on the bottom. Critical Biography of Zhuge Liang by Yu Mingxia eliminates the false material and keeps the true, makes organic combination of thought and action, gives credible history records of life, and restores true colors of Zhuge Liang, which is worthy of high compliment.
出处
《南京晓庄学院学报》
2009年第1期39-42,共4页
Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
关键词
刘备
汉国号
《蜀书》
余明侠
《诸葛亮评传》
Liu Bei
Han as the reigning title
Shu Shu
Yu Mingxia
Critical Biography of Zhuge Liang