期刊文献+

蜂蜇伤所致多器官功能损害临床随机对照研究 被引量:11

Randomized control clinical trial in multi-organ dysfunction by bee sting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较常规治疗与血液灌流(HP)、血液灌流联合连续肾脏替代疗法(HP+CRRT)治疗蜂蜇伤所致多器官功能损害.方法:蜂蜇伤导致多器官功能损害患者24例,拒绝行HP,CRRT的患者分为对照组(n=8),其余的16位患者采用随机数字表方法,随机分为HP,HP+CRRT组,每组8例.观察各组治疗前后的肾功能、肝功能、C反应蛋白(CRP)、肌酸激酶(CK)、肌酸激酶同功酶(CK-MB)变化.比较各组间的治愈率、死亡率、平均住院天数.结果:常规治疗组中2例患者死亡,病死率为25.0%(2/8),其余患者平均住院天数为(17.8±2.3)d,治愈率为62.5%(5/8),HP组平均住院天数为(10.6±1.9)d,HP联合CRRT为(8.3±1.3)d,P<0.05,后两者治愈率分别为87.5%,100.0%.结论:HP联合CRRT较常规治疗组或单用HP组更能有效治疗蜂蜇伤所致多器官功能损害,促进肾功能、肝功能、心肌酶谱改善,从而缩短病程,减少平均住院天数. AIM: To analyze and compare the effect of conventional therapy, hemoperfusion or hemoperfusian combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to treat multi-or-gan dysfunction by bee sting. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with bee sting-caused multi-organ dysfunction were studied. The 8 patients who refused hemoperfusion or CRRT were put in conventional therapy group, and the other 16 patients were put to HP group or HP + CRRT group by random digits table ( n = 8, respec-tively). Renal function, hepatic function, CRP, creatine kinase and MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase were detected before and after treatment, and the recovery rate, the average hospital days and fatality rate were compared. RESULTS: Two cases died in con- ventional group, with the fatality rate 25.0% ( 2/8 ), recovery rate 62.5% (5/8) and the average hospital days ( 17.8±2.3)d. The average hospital days were respectively (10.6±1.9 ) d and (8.3±1.2)d in HP group and in HP + CRRT. Recovery rate in HP and HP combined with CRRT was 87.5% and 100.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: HP combined with CRRT is the most effective in treating multi-organ dysfunction by bee sting a- mong the three therapeutic methods under study. HP combined with CRRT better improves renal function, hepatic function, creatine kinase and MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase, and shortens the hospital days.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2009年第4期371-373,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词 咬伤和蜇伤 黄蜂毒液类 多器官功能衰竭 血液灌流 肾替代疗法 bites and stings wasp venoms multiple organ fail-ure hemoperfusion renal replacement therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献24

  • 1季大玺.血液滤过与血液灌流[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(6):323-325. 被引量:29
  • 2王颖,郭在晨.感染性休克的治疗[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(6):403-405. 被引量:6
  • 3孙东明,程亚颖,井丽娟,尹建英.全身炎症反应综合征患儿血内毒素、脂多糖结合蛋白/脂多糖受体水平变化的意义[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(6):426-427. 被引量:10
  • 4[2]王质刚主编.血液净化学.北京科学技术出版社,1992, 224
  • 5[3]Rommes JH.Jemoperfusion and side-effects.Arch Toxicol,1992,15(supple):40
  • 6[4]Winchester JH.Active Methods for Detoxification Oral sorbents, Forced Diuresis, Hemeperfusion and Hemodialysis.In:haddad LM,Winchester JF.Clinical Management of Drug Overdose. 2nd ed. Philadelplia.Saunders WB,1990,6-7
  • 7[5]Winchester JF. Use of Dialysis and Hemopefusion in Treatment of poisoning. In,Daugirdas JT, Ing TS. Hand book of Dialysis. 2nd ed. Boston, Linttle,Brown and Compang,1994,569-575
  • 8Bernard GR,Artigas A,Brigham KI,et al.The American-European consensus on ARDS definition,mechanisms,relevant outcome and clinical trial coordination [J].Am J Respir Grit Care Med,1994,149:818.
  • 9Ludones F,Chiotti G,Carrier M,et al.Continuous renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery[J].Blood Purify,2004,22(3):249.
  • 10Ji DX,Gong DH,Xie HL,et al.A retrospective study of continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in severe acute renal failure[J].Chin Med J,2001,114(11):1157.

共引文献42

同被引文献49

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部