期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术的不同麻醉方法对术后恢复的影响 被引量:4

Effects of different anesthesia methods on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究不同麻醉方法用于腹腔镜手术患者术后拔除气管导管时对拔管时间及改良OAA/S评分的影响。方法选择行腹腔镜手术的患者40例。将40例患者单纯随机分为T、Ⅰ两组,每组20例。T组:采用静脉输注工作站靶控输注异丙酚和瑞芬太尼;Ⅰ组为静吸复合组。术毕观察自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间、OAA/S评分>5分时间,发生呕吐、烦躁人数。结果发生呕吐、烦躁者人数Ⅰ组明显多于T组,有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间、OAA/S评分>5分时间I组明显长于T组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论TCI靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼用于腹腔镜手术的麻醉可减少术后恢复时的并发症。 Objective To sutdy the effect of different anesthesia methods on the time of tracheal extubation and the scoring of OAA/S in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Methods Forty ASAI ~ Ⅱ patients undergoing laparescopy were randomly divided into 2 groups with 20 patients in each group( T and Ⅰ). Anesthesia in T group was maintained with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesia in I group was maintained with isoflurane inhalant, intermittent boluses of vecuronium and remifentanil continuous infusion. Automatic respiratory recovery time, eyes open time, trachea cannula extubated time and the OAA/S score of 5 degree time were recorded. Results Patients with dyspboria and vomiting in group Ⅰ were more than in group T. (P 〈 0.01 ). Automatic respiratory recovery time, eyes open time, trachea eannula extubated time and the OAA/S score of 5 degree time in group Ⅰ was longer than that in group T( P 〈0.01 ,P 〈0.05) ,respectively. Conclusion TCI propofol and remifentanil has advantage of less complication during postoperative recovery.
出处 《微创医学》 2009年第1期19-21,共3页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜 靶控输注 静吸复合 Laparescopy Target-controlled infusion Intravenous inhalational anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1李丹枫,万曦,魏捷.二异丙酚靶控输注在小儿全身麻醉中的应用研究[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2004,25(6):62-64. 被引量:2
  • 2耿志宇,许幸.瑞芬太尼的临床药理学[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2004,25(4):203-206. 被引量:208
  • 3寿红艳,徐旭仲,金勉.短小手术患儿异丙酚靶控输注与氧化亚氮-异氟醚吸入麻醉效果的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(6):473-474. 被引量:6
  • 4连庆泉,刘华程,上官王宁,徐旭仲,王增寿,吴一兵,姚尚龙.小儿异丙酚靶控输注系统准确性的评价[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(2):118-121. 被引量:17
  • 5[1]Mackenzie N Crant IS.Comparison of the new emulsion formulation of propofol with methohexithone and thiopentone for induction ofanaesthesia in day cases[J].Br J Anaesth,1985,57(6):725.
  • 6[3]Kataria BK,Ved SA.Nicodemus HF,et al.The Phamocokineticsof Propofol in Children using Three Different Analysis Approaches[ J ].Anesthsiology,1994,80(1):104~122.
  • 7[4]Schuttler J Ihmsen H.Population Phamacokinetics of propofol[ J].Anesthesiology,2000,92 (3):727~738.
  • 8[5]Jones RD,Chan K,Andrew LJ.Phannacokinetics of propofol in children[J].Br J Anaesth,1990,65 (5):661~667.
  • 9[6]Mash B,White M,Morton M,et al.Phamacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children[J].Br J Anaeath,1991,67 (1):41~48.
  • 10[7]Morton NS,Wee M,Christie G,et al.Propofol for induction of anaesthesia in children.A comparison with thiopentone and halothane inhalational induction[J].Anaesthesia,1988,43 (5):350~355.

共引文献56

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部