期刊文献+

美国与欧盟的交通政策对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis of Traffic Policy in USA and EU
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合美国与欧盟交通政策的制定背景,分别针对交通政策的目标、重点和内容,对美国与欧盟的交通政策进行比较,发现二者的政策在凸显自身特点的同时,在以人为本、可持续发展、全球化运输等方面又均体现出共性,符合交通运输发展的要求,其对我国交通政策的制定具有一定的借鉴意义。 Combining with the background of constituting traffic policy in USA and EU, in allusion to the object, emphases and content of transport policy, the traffic policy applied in USA and EU are compared. Each policy displays its own characteristics, meanwhile the two have commonness in people oriented traffic, sustainable development and globalization of transport, and accord with the requirement of the development of transport, so they can be consulted by China in constituting traffic policy.
作者 李沛恒
出处 《交通标准化》 2009年第3期216-218,共3页 Communications Standardization
关键词 美国 欧盟 交通政策 America European Union traffic policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1Jarzembowski Report A5-0013/2201 and Swoboda Report A50014/2001,.
  • 2European Commission, White Paper - European transport policy for 2010: time to decide, Sep., 2001.
  • 3European Comrmssion, Green Paper on Security of Supply,Nov,, 2000,.
  • 4胡思继,徐利民等.国家中长期科技发展战略研究“交通科技问题”专题组“综合交通”分组研究报告.北京,2004,11.
  • 5[美]F·J·斯蒂芬森,刘秉镰译.美国的交通运输.北京:人民交通出版社,1990.
  • 6Phil Goodwin. Transformation of transport policy in Great Britain. Transportation Research ,Part A 33 , PP.124-130,1999.
  • 7Claude Henry and Emile Quinet. Which Railways policy and Organsation for France?Journal of Transport Economics and Policy Volume 33 part 1. PP, 119-126,2000.
  • 8Strut Holder. Reacent Developments in Rail Infrastructure Chearging in The European Union.Journal of Transport Economics and Policy ,Volume 33 Part 1, PP.111-118. 2001.
  • 9James A. Doherty. The Railway Policy Debate in Japan and its Domination by old Debt. Transport Economics and Policy .Volume 33 part 1.1998.
  • 10Rafter,David. Sustainable Transportation Planning and the Dublin Transportation Initiative.European Planning Studies, 1996,4(2): 225-231.

共引文献24

同被引文献24

  • 1林晓言.关于运输外部性的一些新思考[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(3):7-12. 被引量:8
  • 2钟涛,刘峰涛.交通运输负外部性的定价策略[J].统计与决策,2007,23(1):48-49. 被引量:5
  • 3许笑平.欧盟运输政策的演变及其评价[J].物流技术,2007,26(5):126-128. 被引量:1
  • 4EdwardJ. Bardi, John.J.Coyle, Robert A.Novack. Transportation[M]. Cincinnati:South-Western College Publishing, 2000.
  • 5黄民,张建平.英国交通运输业的未未--2030年的路网规划[A].黄民,张建平国外交通运输发展战略及启示[C].北京:中国经济出版社,2007,257-359.
  • 6EC, Directorate - General for Economic and Financial Affairs Long - term labour force projections for the 25 EU Member States: A set of data for assessing the economic impact of ageing, 2005.
  • 7Martin Stopford, Hong Kong Shipowners Association,Will the next 50 years be as Chaotic in Shipping as the Last, 18th January, 2007.
  • 8植草益.微观规制经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1992..
  • 9周珂,徐岭.我国绿色经济面临的挑战与发展契机[J]人民论坛,2011(08).
  • 10本报记者 张海燕.乘用车油耗限值标准即将升级[N]中国质量报,2010(005).

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部