期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

Z—ATCM在多层螺旋CT腹部检查中的应用和防护价值 被引量：5

原文传递
导出
摘要 随着多层螺旋CT（MSCT）在临床应用的日益增多，特别是薄层扫描和多期重复扫描的广泛应用，使得受检者接受辐射剂量的增加及其潜在危害性也受到更广泛的关注。本研究通过对2种不同管电流调节技术所获得的肝脏CT影像质量和射线剂量的比较研究，以探讨在MSCT肝脏多期检查中应用Z轴自动管电流调节技术（Z—ATCM）以较低的辐射剂量获得较高图像质量的可行性。
作者 狄幸波 王振 丁忠祥 卢建芳 徐健 刘锦 蔡学祥 吴颖
机构地区 浙江省人民医院放射科
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期110-112,共3页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 多层螺旋CT 腹部检查 防护 辐射剂量 临床应用 重复扫描 薄层扫描 潜在危害
分类号 R816.5 [医药卫生—放射医学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Rogers LF. Radiation exposure in CT: why so high? MR, 2001, 177 (2) : 277-277.
  • 2Slovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? A JR, 2002, 179( 1 ) : 39- 41.
  • 3Kalra MK, Prassad S, Saini S, et al. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. AIR, 2002, 179(5): 1101-1106.
  • 4Menzel HG, Schibilla H, Teunen D. Guidelines on radiation dose on the patient. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006 : 32-33.
  • 5高建华,孙宪昶,李剑颖,李娜,夏庆堂,赵雯,戴汝平.不同前置滤线器对64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量及放射剂量影响的对照研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(8):858-861. 被引量：51
  • 6Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, et al. Low-dose CT of lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology, 1990,175(3):729-731.
  • 7Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AIR, 2001, 177(2): 285- 287.
  • 8Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology, 1992, 185(1) :29-35.
  • 9Haaga JR. Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR, 2001,177(2) :289-291.
  • 10Haaga JR, Miraldi F, Macintyre W, et al. Effect of mAs variation upon CT image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in virto studies. Radiology, 1981,138(2) :449-454.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Haaga JR. Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR,2001,177:289-291.
  • 2Slovis TL.CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR,2002,179: 39-41.
  • 3Rogers LF. Dose reduction in CT:how low can we go? AJR,2002,179:299.
  • 4Menzel HG, Schibilla H, Teunen D. Guidelines on radiation dose on the patient. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. Chapter 1 ( Appendix 1 ). 2006:32-33.
  • 5Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology, 1992, 185:29-35.
  • 6Kaczyk JE, Du Y, Walter DJ, et al. Simulation of CT dose and contrast-to-noise as function of bowtie shape. San Diego CA Proc SPIE ,2004,5368:403-410.
  • 7Toth TL, Esmeli EC, Ikhlef A, et al. Image quality and dose optimization using novel X-ray source filters tailored to patient size. San Diego Ca Proc SPIE ,2005 ,5745 :283-291.
  • 8朱晓华,李士骏,薛永明,邵江,史景云,尤正千.胸部CT低剂量扫描的图像质量与吸收剂量关系分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2003,37(10):945-950. 被引量：136

共引文献50

同被引文献42

  • 1刘昌盛,魏文洲,郑晓华,童世平,殷响林,杨洪飙.低剂量CT扫描对婴幼儿颅脑病变检查的防护价值[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2004,24(3):270-271. 被引量：67
  • 2华建明,陈根松,章伟敏.低剂量颞骨多层螺旋CT扫描技术的应用研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2006,26(5):530-532. 被引量：19
  • 3Rogers LF. Radiation exposure in CT: why so high [ J ]. A JR, 2001, 177(2): 277.
  • 4Slovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required [ J ]. AJR, 2002, 179(1): 39-41.
  • 5Kalra MK, Prassad S, Saini S, et al. Clinical comparison of standard - dose and 50% reduced - dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality[J]. AJR, 2002, 179(5) : 1 101 - 1 106.
  • 6Menzel HG, Schibilla H, Teunen D. Guidelines on radiafiondose on the patient[ Z]. European guidelines on quality crite- ria for computed tomography. 2006 : 32 - 33.
  • 7Haaga JR. Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit [ J ]. A JR, 2001,177 (2) :289 - 291.
  • 8Haaga JR, Miraldi F, Macintyre W, et al. Effect of mAs variation upon CT image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in virto studies[ J]. Radiology, 1981,138 (2) :449 - 454.
  • 9Itoh S,Ikeda M,Arahata S,et al.Lung cancer screening:minimum tube current required for helical CT[J].Radiology,2000,215(1):175-183.
  • 10Greess H,Nomayr A,Wolf H.Dose Reduction in CT Exami-nation of Children by an Attenuation-Based On-Line Mod-ulation of Tube Current(CARE Dose)[J].Eur.Radiol.,2002,(12):1571-1576.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

中华放射医学与防护杂志
2009年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部