公共投资对房地产市场的价格溢出效应研究——基于中国30省市数据的检验被引量：47

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文在构建公共投资与房地产价格关系模型的基础上,利用面板数据检验了公共投资对房地产市场的价格溢出效应。实证结果表明,土地价格受公共投资的影响最大,其次是住宅、办公楼和商业用房;生态环境投资对土地和住宅的溢价值较高;公共交通投资对经营性房地产的溢价值较高;教育投资,尤其是中学教育投资对各类房地产的溢价值较为稳定;以燃气普及率为代表的城市基础设施投资对房地产价格的溢价值也较稳定。上述实证结果说明公共投资是提高城市经济活力的有效方法之一,重新设计房地产税种和税率是我国房地产税制改革的必然选择。

作者周京奎吴晓燕

机构地区南开大学经济研究所天津农学院人文社科系

出处《世界经济文汇》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期15-32,共18页 World Economic Papers

基金国家社会科学基金项目"我国公共住房融资主要问题研究"(08BJY052) 国家社会科学基金重大项目"完善国家宏观调控体系与保持经济平稳较快发展"(06&ZD028) 天津市社科规划重点项目"天津滨海新区城乡建设用地市场一体化--动力机制与政策选择"(TJYY07-2089)的资助

关键词公共投资房地产价格溢价值

分类号 F293.3 [经济管理—国民经济] F830.59 [经济管理—金融学] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Alonso, W. , 1964, "Location and Land Use," Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2Anderson, J.E. , 1985, "On testing the convexity of hedonic price functions," Journal of Urban Economics, 18,334-337.
3Aurelia, Bengochea-Morancho, 2003, "A hedonic valuation of urban green areas," Landscape and Urban Planning, 66, 35.41.
4Benjamin, J.D. and G. S. Sirmans, 1996, "Mass Transportation, Apartment Rent and Property Values," Journal of Real Estate Research, 12(1), 1-8.
5Benson, E. D., J. L. Hansen, A. L. Schwartz and G. T. Smersh, 1998, “Pricing Residential Amenities: the Value of a View,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(1), 55-73.
6Black, S. E. , 1999, "Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577-599.
7Brasington, M. and Diane Hite, 2005, “Demand for Environmental Quality: a Spatial Hedonic Analysis,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 57-82.
8Brueckner, .I. , 1987, “The Structure of Urban Equilibrium: A Unified Treatment of the Muth-Mills Model,” in: E. Mills ( Ed. ), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 2, Elsevier, North Holland.
9Chiodo, A. , R. Hernandez-MuriUo and M. Owyang, 2003, "Nonlinear Hedonics and the Search for School District Quality," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Paper 2003-039C.
10Etsuroshioji, 2001, “Public Capital and Economic Growth: A Convergence Approach,” Journal of economic Growth, 6, 205 -227.

二级参考文献20

1[1]Ding Chengri. Managing urban growth for efficiency in infrastructure provision: dynamic capital expansion and urban growth boundary models. Ph.D. Dissertation, 1996.
2[2]Mills E S. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 1967, 57:197-210.
3[3]Muth R F. Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
4[4]Alonso W. Location and Land Use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.
5[5]Brueckner Jan. The structure of urban equilibria: a unified treatment of the Muth-Mills Model. In: E S Mills (ed.),Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. Ⅱ. Elsevier Science Publisher B V, 1987.
6[8]Haruya Hiroka. The development of Tokyo's rail network. Japan Railway & Transport Review, 2000, 23, March.
7[9]Papageorgiou Yorgos, David Pines. An Essay on Urban Economic Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
8[10]Bertaud Alain. Metropolitan Structures around the world: What is common? What is difference? What is relevance to Marikina in the context of Metro Manila? Presentation in Marikina, 2003.
9[11]Cervero Robert, Kang-Li Wu. Sub-centering and commuting: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area, 1980-1990.Urban Studies, 1998, 35(7): 1059-1076.
10[12]McMillen Daniel P. Employment Subcenters in Chicago: Past, Present, and Future Economic Perspectives. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 2003.