摘要
怀特海创立过程哲学旨在克服传统实体思维困境,并提出重建科学形而上学基础的任务和方法;海德格尔认为传统形而上学混淆了存在者与存在,其根源在于主客二分的认知方式,克服实体思维的知性主客二分悖谬在于建构一种过程思维方式,海德格尔的过程观是存在过程论。二者对传统形而上学的批判与超越具有异工同曲之妙。
Whitehead establishes process philosophy whose keynote is to overcome the thinking predicament of traditional entity and sets forth the tasks and the methods to reconstruct the foundation of scientific metaphysics. In contrast, Heidegger thinks the deepest reason why traditional metaphysics confuses beings and existence lies in their thinking mode to separate subject and object. He thinks that establishing a kind of process thinking mode is the key to getting over the fallacy to separate subject and object. So Heidegger's process concept is, in nature, the theory of existence process. In criticizing and transcending over traditional metaphysics, Heidegger and Whitehead adopted different approaches but yielded the same excellent resuhs.
出处
《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2009年第2期10-14,共5页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
河北省哲学社会科学规划研究2006年度研究项目"马克思主义哲学过程思想研究"(200608010)阶段成果
关键词
存在过程论
过程哲学
对话
海德格尔
怀特海
Theory of Existence Process
process philosophy
dialogue
Heidegger
Whitehead