期刊文献+

CrylA毒素与二化螟中肠刷状缘膜囊泡受体蛋白配基结合分析 被引量:2

Ligand blot analysis of Bt CrylA toxin binding with the midgut brush border membrane vesicle receptors of Chilo suppressalis(Lepidoptera:Pyralidae)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分离和鉴定二化螟Chilo suppresalis幼虫中肠刷状缘膜囊泡(BBMV)中Cryl A毒素的受体蛋白,对于阐明Cryl A毒素作用机理和二化螟抗性机理具有十分重要的意义。为此,本文就Cryl A毒素对二化螟杀虫活性及Cryl Ac与二化螟中肠受体的配基结合进行了研究。结果表明:Cryl Ab对二化螟室内品系(CN)的毒力高于Cryl Ac,而Cryl Ac高于Cryl Aa。配基结合分析表明二化螟CN品系幼虫中肠BBMV中有6个Cryl Ac结合蛋白(分子量分别为50,70,90, 120,160和180 kDa),其中180,160和90 kDa结合蛋白的条带颜色明显深于其他结合蛋白的条带,表明这3个受体蛋白具有较高的结合浓度。同源竞争结合研究表明,180和90 kDa结合蛋白为Cryl Ac的低亲合性结合蛋白,其他4个为高亲合性结合蛋白。为了研究Cryl Ac和Cryl Ab受体结合部位的相互作用,进行了异源竞争结合研究。Cryl Ab可以与Cryl Ac所有的6个结合蛋白进行竞争性结合,与180,120,70和50 kDa结合蛋白具有高亲合性,而与160和90 kDa结合蛋白具有低亲合性。结果显示,Cryl Ac与Cryl Ab在二化螟幼虫中肠BBMV上拥有多个共享的结合位点,但对每个结合位点的亲合性有差异。基于毒素结合部位的相似性,Cryl Ac和Cryl Ab不宜同时用于转基因Bt水稻来控制二化螟。 Isolation and identification of the binding proteins of Cry1A toxins in the midgut brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) of Chilo suppressalis is very important for understanding the mode of action and resistance mechanism of Cry1A toxins. In the present study, insecticidal activity and ligand binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins to the midgut BBMV of striped rice stem borer C. suppresalis were investigated. The results indicated that Cry1Ab was more toxic than Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ac was more toxic than Cry1Aa against the 3rd instar larvae of the laboratory strain (CN) of C. suppresalis. Ligand blot analysis showed that there were six major proteins (50, 70, 90, 120, 160 and 180 kDa) binding to Cry1Ac in the midgut BBMV of the CN strain. Bands of 180, 160 and 90 kDa binding proteins were much darker than the others, suggesting that these proteins had higher binding concentrations. Results of homologous competition binding indicated that the 180 and 90 kDa protein bands were of low binding affinity, while the other four protein bands (160, 120, 70 and 50 kDa) were of high binding affinity. Heterologous competition binding assays were conducted to study cross-reactivity of the binding sites between Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac. Cry1Ab competed for all binding sites recognized by Cry1Ac, with high affinity to 180, 120, 70 and 50 kDa proteins and low affinity to 160 and 90 kDa proteins. These data suggest that Cry1Ac and Cry1Ab share several common binding sites in the midgut BBMV of C. suppressalis, but they have different binding affinity with respect to each binding site. Considering the similarity in binding sites, Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac should not be used simultaneously in the transgenic Bt rice to control the target pest C. suppressalis.
出处 《昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期153-158,共6页 Acta Entomologica Sinica
基金 国家“973”计划项目(2007CB109204)
关键词 二化螟 刷状缘膜囊泡 苏云金杆菌 CRY1A 配基印迹 Chilo suppressalis brush border membrane vesicle (BBMV) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1 A ligand blot
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Alcantara EP, Aguda RM, Curtiss A, Dean DH, Cohen MB, 2004.Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin binding to brush border membrane vesicles of rice stem borers. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol., 55: 169 - 177.
  • 2Bradford MM, 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72 : 248 - 254.
  • 3Bravo A, Gill SS, Sober6n M, 2007. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon, 49:423-435.
  • 4Fiuza L, Nielsen-Leroux C,Goze E, Frutos R, Charles J, 1996. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cryl toxins to the midgut brush border membrane vesicles of Chilo suppressalis ( Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) : Evidence of shared binding sites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62: 1 544-1 549.
  • 5Gahan LJ, Gould F, Heckel DG, 2001. Identification of a gene associated with Bt resistance in Heliothis virescens. Science, 293: 857 - 860.
  • 6Gill SS, Cowles EA, Pietrantonio PV, 1992. The mode of action of Bacillus thuringieusis endotoxins. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 37:615 - 636.
  • 7Gill M, Ellar D.1, 2002. Transgenic Drosophila reveals a functional in vivo receptor for the Bacillus thuringieusis toxin CrylAcl. Insect Mol. Biol., 11 : 619 -625.
  • 8韩兰芝,吴孔明,彭于发,郭予元.转基因抗虫水稻生态安全性研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(3):431-436. 被引量:31
  • 9Hecke! DG, Gahan LJ, Baxter SW, Zhao JZ, Shehon AM, Gould F, Tabashnik BE, 2007. The diversity of Bt resistance genes in species of Lepidoptera. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 95 : 192 - 197.
  • 10Herrero S, Gechev T, Bakker PL, Moar WJ, de Maagd RA, 2005. Bacillus thuringiensis CrylCa-resistant Spodoptera exigua lacks expression of one of four aminopeptidase N genes. BMC Genomics, 6: 96.

二级参考文献41

  • 1陈之浩,刘传秀,李凤良,韩招久.杀虫双和杀螟丹选育对小菜蛾抗药性的形成及其抗性机制[J].昆虫学报,1993,36(4):409-418. 被引量:44
  • 2刘雨芳.转Bt基因抗虫水稻的研究进展与生态安全评价[J].生命科学研究,2004,8(4):294-299. 被引量:24
  • 3尚稚珍.二化螟饲养方法的研究[J].昆虫学报,1979,22(3):164-167.
  • 4苏建坤 刘怀阿 等.江苏里下河地区水稻二化螟抗药性监测[J].南京农业大学学报,1996,19:28-33.
  • 5肖爱金.应城1代二化螟持续大发生原因分析及综防对策[A]..见:中国昆虫学会第六次全国代表大会暨学术讨论会论文摘要集[C].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997..
  • 6刘松林.开创新世纪植物保护工作新局面的几点思考[A]..见:面向21世纪的植物保护发展战略[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2001.115.
  • 7Scott J G, Wen Z M. Toxicity of fipronil to susceptible and resistant strains of German cockroaches(Dictyoptera: Blattellidae)and house flies(Diptera: Muscidae). J Econ Entomol, 1997, 90(5):1152-1156.
  • 8Valles S M, Koehler P G, Brenner R J. Antagonism of fipronil toxicity by piperonyl butoxide and S, S, S-tributy phosphorotrithioate in the German cockroach(Dictyoptera: Blattellidae). J Econ Entomol, 1997, 90(5): 1254-1258.
  • 9Liu N N, Yue X. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in the house fly(Diptera: Muscidae). J Econ Entomol, 2000, 93(4): 1269-1275.
  • 10陈志群 朴永范.农民田间学校在农技推广中的作用[A]..21世纪植物保护战略学说研讨会论文集[C].北京:科学技术出版社,2001..

共引文献141

同被引文献95

引证文献2

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部