期刊文献+

HRT对悬挂链曝气式接触氧化处理污染河水的影响 被引量:1

EFFECT OF HRT ON CONTACT OXIDATION OF SUSPEND CHAIN FLOATING AERATION TREATING POLLUTED RIVER
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考察了不同水力停留时间(HRT)下,厌氧-缺氧-悬挂链曝气式接触氧化对重、轻度污染河水的净化效果。结果表明,HRT为2、4、8、12h时,在重、轻度污水水质COD为58.67~85.33mg·L-1、26.67~42.67mg·L-1;NH4+-N为5.20~11.30mg·L-1、2.79~3.47mg·L-1;TN为8.10~14.18mg·L-1、3.15~3.38mg·L-1;TP为0.62~0.82mg·L-1、0.35~0.39mg·L-1两种典型进水水质情况下,COD、NH4+-N和TN的平均去除率都随HRT的增加而升高,但在HRT为8h后,平均去除率的增幅都变小。TP在重、轻度污水时随HRT变化去除率差异不大。考虑节能与效率,该工艺适宜的HRT为8h,此时重、轻度污染河水的主要污染指标平均去除率COD为61.87%、25.39%;NH4+-N为61.25%、51.04%;TN为37.66%、26.51%;TP为10.19%、8.77%。 Anaerobic-anoxic-suspend chain floating contact oxidation was investigated to treat heavy and light polluted fiver at different hydraulic retention time (HRT). The results showed that under the condition of HRT was at 2 h, 4 h, 8 h and 12 h, when influent was heavy polluted fiver, COD: 58.67 ~85.33 mg- L^-1,NH4^+-N: 5.20 ~ 11.30 mg· L^-1,TN: 8.10 ~ 14.18 mg· L^-1,TP: 0.62 ~0.82 mg· L^-1; light polluted fiver, COD:26.67 ~42.67 mg· L^-1, NH4^+-N:2.79~3.47 mg.L^-1, TN:3.15~3.38 mg-L^-1, TP:0.35~0.39 mg.L^-1, the average removal rate of COD, NH4^+-N and TN increased with HRT increasing, but after 8 h, the amplitude of average removal was lessening. The average removal rate of TP was little different with the changing of HRT at heavy and light polluted fiver. To consider energy conservatiori and efficiency, the HRT for this technics was 8 h, then the average removal rate of main polluted index was COD:61.87%,25.39%; NH4^+-N:61.25%,51.04%; TN:37.66%,26.51%; TP:10.19%,8.77%.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期62-65,共4页 Technology of Water Treatment
基金 国家十五重大科技专项(863)示范(2005AA601010)
关键词 HRT 厌氧-缺氧-悬挂链曝气式接触氧化 污染河水 hydraulic retention time anaerobic-anoxic-suspend chain floating contact oxidation polluted river
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1FARM C. Evaluation of the accumulation of sediment and heavy metals in a storm-water detention pond [J].Water Science and Technology,2002,45(7): 105-112.
  • 2PETTERSSON THOMAS J R. Water quality improvement in a small stormwater detention pond [J].Water Science and Technology, 1998,38(10): 115-122.
  • 3MARSALEK J, ROCHFORT Q. Assessment of stormwater impacts on an urban stream with a detention pond [J].Water Science and Technology,2001,45(3):255-263.
  • 4VAN BUREN M A, WATT W E. Removal of selected urban storm-water constituents by an on-stream pond [J].Journal of Environmental Planning&Management, 1997,40( 1 ): 5-14.
  • 5贾国东,彭平安,傅家谟.珠江口近百年来富营养化加剧的沉积记录[J].第四纪研究,2002,22(2):158-165. 被引量:77
  • 6冯庆,王晓燕.滇池流域非点源污染研究进展[J].云南地理环境研究,2008,20(1):41-44. 被引量:6
  • 7于翠松,安玉坤,郝振纯.济南市小清河水生态治理对策研究[J].海河水利,2006(1):21-23. 被引量:9
  • 8林涛,谢振华.绍兴市环城河水污染现状与对策研究[J].中国水利,2006(5):44-46. 被引量:6
  • 9LIU J X, GROENESTIJIN J W, DODDEMA H J, et al. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus using a new biofilm-activated sludge system[J].Water Science and Technology, 1996,34( 1-2):315-322.
  • 10REN N Q, CHEN Z B, WANG A J, et al. Removal of organic pollutants and analysis of MLSS-COD removal relationship at different HRTs in a submerged membrane bioreactor [J].International Biodeterioration&Biodegradation,2005,55:279-284.

二级参考文献35

共引文献108

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部