期刊文献+

海牙《选择法院协议公约》之防御性机制研究 被引量:2

Study on the Defensive Mechanism of Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为目标宏大的《民商事管辖权与判决公约》难产的情况下达成的最大共识的产物,《选择法院协议公约》包含了大量的排除公约适用的防御性条款,对此深入研究可以为我国批准和加入公约后更好地解决国际民事诉讼中管辖权的冲突,以及更好的保护我国的司法主权提供理论基础。 The "Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements", as the greatest agreements of the failed ambitious plan of "Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters", contains a lot of defensive clauses of excluding the application. Specializing in these clauses, we will have profound theoretical foundation to gestate better solutions on the conflicts of the international civil litigation jurisdiction and to get well protection on our judicial sovereignty after China has authorized the ratification on the convention.
作者 严红 陈剑
出处 《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期9-15,共7页 Contemporary Law Review
关键词 管辖权冲突 协议选择法院 排除适用 conflicts on jurisdiction, choice of court, excluding the application
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1宋杰.对《维也纳条约法公约》关于条约解释规则的再认识[J].孝感学院学报,2007,27(1):76-81. 被引量:15
  • 2Masato Dogauchi, Trevor C. Hartley, Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Draft Report, Preliminary Document No 25 of March 2004, Hague Conference on Private International Law, [ EB/OL]. http://www. hcch. net/index_en.php? act = publications. details&pid = 3510&zoek = Masato% 20Dogauchi, 2008 - 8 -6.
  • 3Special Commission on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, "Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements", Working Document No 110 E, Hague Conference on Private International Law, May 2004 [ EB/OL]. http://www.hcch. net/index_en.php? act = publications. details&pid = 3511&zoek = Draft% 200n%20Exclusive%20Choice%20of% 20Court% 20Agreements, 2008 -8 -6 .
  • 4外交会议上关于该条草案的讨论.2005年6月20日第二委员会会议讨论记录(第2号).
  • 5National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Sanders 271 F. Supp. 756, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10858.
  • 6GreCon Dimter Inc. v. J.R. Normand Inc. , File No. 30217, Supreme Court of Canada [ 2005 ] 2 S. C. R. 401 ; 2005 SCC 46 ; 2005 S. C. R. LEXIS 42 ; [2005 ] S. C.J. No. 46.
  • 7HongKong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Suveyke, 392 F. Supp. 2d 489, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23630
  • 8外交大会上欧盟代表对这一条的阐述.2005年6月15日第二委员会会议讨论记录(第3号),第9页.
  • 9[EB/OL] http: //wwet/w. hcch. nindex en. php? act=authorities. listing,2008 - 8 - 10.

二级参考文献17

  • 1《联合国宪章》.
  • 2理查德·A·波斯纳 苏力译.法理学问题[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.59.
  • 3《惩治及防止灭种罪公约》
  • 4《灭种罪公约》
  • 5Maarten Bos.Theory and Practice of Treaty Interpretation[J].Netherland International Law Review,1980(ⅩⅩⅦ).
  • 6Waldock.Third Report on the Law of Treaties:vol Ⅱ[M].Yearbook of the International Law Commission,1964(New York,1965).
  • 7Hersch Lauterpacht.Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties[M].British Yearbook of International Law,1949.
  • 8Hersch Lauterpacht.International law:Collected Papers[M].Cambridge,1970.
  • 9ICJ Reports[R].1951.
  • 10Constance Jean Schwindt.Interpreting the United Nationa Charter:from Treaty to World Constitution[J].Davis Journal of International Law & Policy,2000(Spring).

共引文献14

同被引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部