期刊文献+

论记者拒证权 被引量:7

On the Reporter's Privilege
下载PDF
导出
摘要 记者拒证权是指在司法活动中,新闻记者拒绝作证提供消息来源的权利。其保护对象不涉及提供者而只针对记者。记者拒证权的目的是为了保护信息来源,而不是信息本身。拒证权是利益平衡的结果,是寻求案件真相向新闻自由作出的必要让步。拒证权的内容可分为四个方面:(1)拒绝公开信息来源的身份;(2)拒绝开示可能曝光提供者身份的信息内容;(3)拒绝接受询问;(4)拒绝接受搜查、扣押。中国在记者拒证权问题上应当采取渐进式立法。 The reporter's privilege is the right of journalists refusing to testify and provide the sources of the news. It is designed to protect the sources of information, rather than the information itself. The reporter's privilege is the outcome of a balance between truth of the case and the freedom of the press. It is necessary that the judicial interest make concessions to the freedom of the press. The content of the reporter's privilege can be divided into four areas: (1) refusing to disclose the provider of the sources of information; (2) refusing to disclose information leading to the disclosure of the identity of the provider; (3) refusing to accept questioning (4) refusing to accept search and seizure. In China, the reporter's privilege should be taken to progressive legislation.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期181-190,共10页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(06XFX016)
关键词 记者拒证权 作证豁免权 利益平衡 信息来源 程序权利 reporter's privilege immunity of witness interest balance sources of information procedural rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1吴巡龙.《记者有无拒绝证言权》[J].月旦法学教室,2007,:26-27.
  • 2[英]萨利·斯皮尔伯利.《媒体法》,周文译,武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004年.
  • 3Kirsten B. Mitchell,"Shielding Sources around the World," The News Media & The Law, Vol. 29,No. 1(2005) ,p. 9.
  • 4The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The Reporter's Privilege Compendium, http://www, refp. org/cgi-local/privilege/item, cgi? i=intro,2008 - 08 - 21.
  • 5Grant Penrod,"Buttressing the First Amendment," The News Media & The Law, Vol. 29, No. 1 (2005), p. 4.
  • 6Monica Dias, Branzburg Revisited. The News Media & The Law, Vol. 26, No. l (2002) p. 4.
  • 7The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, "A Short History of Attempts to Pass a Federal Shield Law," The News Media & The Law, Vol. 28,No. 4(2004) ,p. 9.
  • 8Arthur Best, Evidence & Examples and Explanations, Aspen.. Aspen Publishers, 2004.
  • 9The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, no is Covered? Whose Privilege is it? http://www. rcfp. org/privilege/index, php? op= browse&state= NY, 2008 - 08 - 21.
  • 10佚名.《德国刑事诉讼法典》,李昌柯译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995年.

二级参考文献4

  • 1[3]Blair v.U.S.,250 U.S.273(1919)
  • 2[6][16][17]Branzburg v.Hayes,408 U.S.665(1972)
  • 3[10][12]Dwight L.Teeter,Don R.Le Duc(1992),Law of Mass Communication:Freedom and Control of Print and Broadcast Media,The Foundation Press,lnc.PP.553-554
  • 4[13]John D.Zelezny (2004),Case in Communications Law:Liberties,Restraints and the Modern Media (Fourth edition),Peking University Press,PP.155

共引文献8

同被引文献79

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部