犯罪构成理论体系改造研究的现场叙事——兼对一种改良论主张的若干评论

A Review of the Current Theories Concerning the Constitution of Crime

对于现行的犯罪构成理论,我国刑法学界存在维持论(维持现状)、改良论(修修补补)和重构论(推倒重来)三种倾向。"维持论"者在理论和实践上可能存在着"两头轻"问题,此种观点首先需要摒弃。改良论尽管较之维持论具有一定的进步意义,但是在立场上是不彻底的。事实上,改良论者的两点改良建议已经分别从外观和内容上具有了重构现有犯罪构成理论的朦胧韵味,应该将改良论的主张再向前推进一步,直接导入德日的阶层式体系作为我国重构犯罪论体系的目标。也就是说,应当坚持激进的重构论的主张。

There are three tendencies held by the criminal law scholar about the current theory of the constitution of crime, i.e. , the theory of maintenance, the theory of reform, and the theory of reconstruction. The article emphasizes on the difference and relation between the theory of radical reconstruction and the theory of reform and considers that though the theory of reform is superior to the theory of maintenance, the position of this theory is incomplete. In fact, the two suggestions of the theory of reform have separately possessed the dimly meaning of reconstruct the current theory of constitutes of crime in appearance and content, and these suggestions should be advanced further, directly introduces the leveled theory of Germany and Japan as our aim of the reconstruction of the theory of constitutes of crime.