期刊文献+

光学显微镜食管下段细胞间隙的测量对胃食管反流病诊断的意义 被引量:9

A study on the light microscopic measurement of intercellular space of squamous epithelium in lower- esophagus to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过光学显微镜(光镜)对胃食管反流病(GERD)患者食管下段细胞间隙的测量,探讨光镜下细胞间隙的变化对GERD的诊断意义。方法158例受试者行内镜检查,分为正常对照组(25例)、非糜烂性反流病(NERD)组(58例)和糜烂性食管炎(EE)组(75例),在齿状线以上2~3cm取活检行光镜检查,并随机选取43例(其中正常对照组4例,EE组28例,NERD组11例)在相同部位取活检同时进行电镜检查。光镜/电镜下观察切片并采集图像,采用图像分析系统对每例切片测量100个细胞间隙,并进行统计学分析。结果正常对照组、NERD组及EE组光镜下测量的平均细胞间隙(LMIS)分别为(0.61±0.10)μm、(1.12±0.61)μm和(1.30±0.19)μm,3组两两相比差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);EE组不同洛杉矶分级的各亚组间相比,细胞间隙增宽程度的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);NERD患者食管24hpH监测阳性者(40例)与阴性者(17例)LMIS的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);光镜下LMIS的截断(cut—off)值为0.85μm,如果以临床症状加内镜和食管24hpH监测综合作为诊断GERD的金标准,LMIS诊断GERD的敏感性为95.5%,特异性为100.0%;同时做光镜和电镜测量的受试者共43例,经相关性分析和一致性检验,光镜测量和电镜测量的细胞间隙宽度显著相关(r=0.737,P=0.000),且一致性好。结论GERD患者食管下段组织的细胞间隙可通过光镜进行定量测量,其结果与电镜测量结果的一致性好。光镜下细胞间隙增宽可以作为GERD诊断的敏感、特异且较为客观的指标之一。 Objective To evaluate the significance of dilated intercellular space (DIS) of squamous epithelium in lower-esophagus which was measured at light microscopy (LM) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods This study was divided into two parts. The first part consists of 133 GERD patients with typical symptoms, including 75 erosive esophagitis (EE) and 58 non- erosive reflux disease (NERD) ; the second part consists of 25 healthy volunteers as control; ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring, endoscopy and biopsies which were taken in lower esophagus were performed in all individuals. NERD patients with negative ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring were undertaken PPI test. We selected 43 individuals randomly (4 control, 11 NERD and 28 EE) to measure the intercellular space diameter with LM and transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) simultaneously. All the samples were observed at immersion objective, taken pictures and make the scale at the same time; all the pictures were measured by the computer-assisted morphometry and in the samples for one case should be measured 100 points and then calculate the mean intercellular space diameter, while the TEM has the same procedures. Results A total of 158 individuals (90 male, 68 female) were enrolled in this study. The mean intercellular space diameter with LM of the controls, the NERD and the EE patients were (0. 61 ± 0. 10) μm, ( 1.12 ±0. 61 ) μm and ( 1.30 ±0. 19) μm, respectively, with significant differences between the control and NERD group, the control and EE group, the EE and NERD group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; the mean intercellular space diameter with LM of EE subgroup of LA-A, LA-B, LA-C, LA-D were ( 1.31 ± 0. 23) μm, ( 1.27 ±0. 17) μm, ( 1.31±0. 14) μm, (1.33 ±0. 11)μm, respectively, without significant differences among every two subgroups ( P 〉 0. 05 ) ; NERD patients with positive and negative 24-hr ambulatory pH monitoring were 40 and 17 cases, and the mean intercellular space diameter with LM were ( 1.12 ±0. 16 ) μm, ( 1.11 ± 0. 31 ) μm, respectively, without significant differences between them ( P 〉 0. 05) ; the cut-off value of mean intercellular space diameter with LM was 0. 85 μm, if combination the clinical GERD symptom, endoscopy and 24-hr ambulatory pH monitoring as gold standard, its sensitivity was 95.5% and specificity was 100% ; the intercellular space diameter of the controls, the NERD patients and the EE patients with TEM were (0. 30 ±0. 14) μm, ( 1.33 ±0. 28) μm, ( 1.40 ±0. 22) μm, respectively, with significant differences between the control and NERD group, the control and EE group (P 〈 0. 05). It was significant correlation in intercellular space diameter between LM and TEM ( r = 0. 737, P = 0. 000 ). Conclusions The intercellular space diameter of squamous epithelium in lower esophagus of GERD patients can make quantitative study with LM. It is significant correlation with TEM. DIS with LM is one of sensitive, specific and objective marker of GERD.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期208-212,共5页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 胃食管反流病 细胞间隙增宽 光镜测量 电镜 Gastroesophageal reflux disease Dilated intercellular space Light microscopy Electronic microscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux-damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology, 1996,111 : 1200-1205.
  • 2Villanacci V, Grigolato PG, Cestari R, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces as markers of reflux disease: histology, semiquantitative score and morphometry upon light microscopy. Digestion, 2001, 64:1-8.
  • 3Calabrese C, Fabbri A, Bortolotti M, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage: comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with or without bile reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2003.18 : 525 -532.
  • 4刘韶辉,熊理守,林金坤,吴金浪,卢德优,胡品津,陈旻湖.非糜烂性反流病食管黏膜超微结构研究[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(1):18-21. 被引量:16
  • 5Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroentrol,2005 ,100 :543-548.
  • 6薛艳,周丽雅,林三仁,黄永辉.胃食管反流病患者食管下段鳞状上皮细胞间隙的改变[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(12):797-800. 被引量:17
  • 7Bove M, Vieth M, Dombrowski F, et al. Acid challenge to the human esophageal mucosa: effects on epithelial architecture in health and disease. Dig Dis Sci,2005,50:1488-1496.
  • 8王琨,段丽萍,陈洪,夏志伟,林三仁.反流性食管炎与非糜烂性反流病食管酸暴露的特点比较[J].中华内科杂志,2005,40(1):5-8. 被引量:45
  • 9Ravelli AM, Villanacci V, Ruzzenenti N, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces : a major morphological feature of esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr,2006,42:510-515.
  • 10Takubo K, Honma N, Aryal G, et al. Is there a set of histologic changes that are invariably reflux associated? Arch Pathol Lab Med ,2005,129 : 159-163.

二级参考文献30

  • 1薛艳,周丽雅,林三仁,黄永辉.高清晰放大内镜诊断非糜烂性反流病的研究[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(5):389-392. 被引量:25
  • 2An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management: the Genval Workshop Report. Gut, 1999,44 Suppl 2 : S1-S16.
  • 3Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, et al. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)-acid reflux and symptom pattern. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2003,17:537-545.
  • 4Fass R, Fennerty MB, Vakil N. Nonerosive reflux disease:current concept and dilemmas. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001,96:303-314.
  • 5Pace F, BoUani S, Molteni P, et al. Natural history of gastrooesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD):a reappraisal 10 years on. Dig Liver Dis, 2004,36:111-115.
  • 6Peghini PL, Katz PO, Bracy NA, et all Nocturnal recovery of gastric acid secretion with twice-daily dosing of proton pump inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol, 1998,93:763-767.
  • 7Lind T, Havelund T, Carlsson R, et al. Heartburn without esophagitis: efficacy of omeprazole therapy and features determining therapeutic response. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1997,32:974-979.
  • 8Fass R, Tougas G. Functional heartburn : the stimulus, the pain,and the brain. Gut, 2003,51:885-892.
  • 9Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome Ⅱ process. Gut,1999,45 Suppl 2 :Ⅱ 1-5.
  • 10Just RJ, Lelte LP, Castell DO. Changes in overnight fasting intragastric pH show poor correlation with duodenogastric bile reflux in normal subjects. Am J Gastroenterol, 1996,91:1567-1570.

共引文献72

同被引文献100

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部