期刊文献+

神经肌肉阻滞程度对上肢运动诱发电位的影响 被引量:11

Influence of neuromuscular blockade on motor evoked potential of forearm muscles
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同神经肌肉阻滞程度对上肢前臂运动诱发电位(MEP)的影响。方法随机选择40例自2007年1—3月期间于华山医院择期行神经外科手术的ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级患者,全麻诱导后均给予丙泊酚+芬太尼+维库溴铵全凭静脉麻醉,术中维持脑电双频指数(BIS)值于50±10,芬太尼以2μg·kg^-1·h^-1持续静脉输注,肌松维持用维库溴铵静脉持续输注并行TOF监测,分别于TOF4(TOF=4)、TOF2(TOF=2)及TOF0(TOF=0)时,监测上肢前臂各肌群的MEP,记录并比较潜伏期和波幅的变化。结果随着肌松程度的不断增加,MEP的波幅显著减小(P〈0.05),潜伏期在TOF2较TOF4差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),而TOF0绝大部分患者已无法记录到MEP波形(P〈0.01)。结论神经肌肉阻滞剂能明显抑制MEP的产生,且呈显著的剂量依赖性。 Objective To investigate the influence of different degrees of neuromuscular blockade on motor evoked potential (MEP) of forearm muscles under the same condition of anesthesia depth and analgesia. Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱpatients aged 20 - 60 underwent general anesthesia via intravenous injection of propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium to achieve the bispectral index (BIS) at the level of (50 + 10) during neurosurgical operation. The patients were all given fentanyl infusion at a rate of 2 μg/kg/h during the operation and continuous vecuronium injection while the value of train of four stimulations (TOF) was monitored under 3 different levels : TOF = 4 ( TOF4 ), TOF = 2 ( TOF2 ), and TOF = 0 ( TOF0 ). The values of amplitude and latency at the 3 forearm muscles, forearm flexors (FF) , abductor pollicis brevis (APB), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) were monitored and compared under stable hemodynamic status. Results There was no significant differences in the latency of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) between the anesthesia status TOF4 and anesthesia status TOF2 in FF, APB, and ADM ( all P 〉 0. 05 ). The amplitude of CMAP deceased gradually as the degree of neuromuscular blockade increased in FF,APB, and ADM (all P 〈0.05). CMAP could not be recorded when the value of TOF was 0 ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion Neuromuscular blocking drugs significantly depress the MEP in a dose-dependent manner, lntra-operatively it may be preferable to maintain the value of TOF not less than 2 during the critical periods of MEP monitoring.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期445-448,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 神经肌肉阻滞 运动诱发电位 经颅短串电刺激 术中监护 Neuromuscular blockade .,Motor evoked potential Transcranial short train electrical stimulation Intraoperative monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia : the phenomenon of " anesthetic fade " J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2005, 17: 13-19.
  • 2Mills KR, Murray NM, Hess CW. Magnetic and electrical transcranial brain stimulation: physiological mechanism and clinical applications. Neurosurgery, 1987, 20: !64-166.
  • 3Valverde Junquito JL, Aldana Diaz EM, Perez Lorensu PJ, et al. Anesthetic and physiologic implications of neurophysiologic monitoring with evoked potentials during spinal surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2007, 54: 231-241.
  • 4van Dongen EP, Beek HT, Schepens MA, et al. Within-patient variability of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to muhipulse transcranial electrical stimulation during two levels of partial neuromuscular blockade in arotic surgery. Anesth Analg, 1999, 88 : 22-27.
  • 5Pechstein U, Cedzich C. Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery, 1996, 39: 335-344.
  • 6Mochida L, Lomori H, Okawa A, et al. Evaluation of moter function during thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal surgery basdcd on motor-evoked potentials using train spinal stimulation. Spine, 1997, 22: 1385-1393.
  • 7Kajiyama S, Sanuki M, Kinoshita H. Effect of bolus propofol administration on muscle evoked potential (MsEP) during spine surgery. Masui, 2001, 50: 867-873.
  • 8Yamamoto Y, Kawaquchi M, Hayashi H, et al. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor- evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesth Analg,2008, 106 : 950-934.
  • 9Zhou HH, Zhu C. Comparison of isoflurane effects on motor evoked potential and F wave. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93 : 32-38.
  • 10Lotto ML, Banoub M, Schubert A. Effects of anesthetic agents and physiologic changes on intraoperative motor evoked potentials. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol,2004, 16: 32-42.

同被引文献82

  • 1裘毅敏,李士通,沈浩,顾靖.异丙酚对兔蓝斑去甲肾上腺素释放的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(2):133-135. 被引量:11
  • 2廖晓灵,黄光富,袁利民,冯海龙,唐健,谭海斌.神经导航在颅脑微创手术中的临床应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2005,10(3):216-217. 被引量:15
  • 3Tanaka S,Tashiro T,Gomi A, et al. Sensitivity andspecificity in transcranial motor-evoked potentialmonitoring during neurosurgical operations [ J ]. SurgNeurul Int ,2011:111.
  • 4Weinzicrl MR,Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM,et al. Combinedmotor and somatosensory evoked potentials forintraoperative monitoring: intra-and postoperative data ina series of 69 operations[J]. Neurosurg Rev ,2007,30(2):109- 116.
  • 5Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, et al. Motor evokedpotential monitoring with supratentorial surgery [ J ].Neurosurgery,2004 ,54(5) : 1061 ~ 1072.
  • 6Fulkerson DH, Satyan KB, Wilder LM, et al.Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials invery young children [ J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr , 2011 ? 7?4):331 - 337.
  • 7Neuloh G,Schramm J. Monitoring of motor evokedpotentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentialsand microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebralaneurysm surgery [J]. J Neurosurg , 2004 , 100 ( 3 ) : 389-399.
  • 8Motoyama Y,Kawaguchi M, Yamada S, et al. Evaluationof combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motorevoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysmsurgery[J]. Neurol Med Chir ( Tokyo) , 2011 ,51(1):15-22.
  • 9Duffau H,Lopes M, Arthuis F, et al. Contribution ofintraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of lowgrade gliomas: a comparative study between two serieswithoutC 1985 - 1996) and with( 1996 - 2003 ) functionalmapping in the same institution[J]. J Neurol NeurosurgPsychiatry ,2005 ,76(6) :845 - 851.
  • 10Dehaene S, Dupoux E,Mehler J, et al. Anatomicalvariability in the cortical representation of first and secondlanguage[J]. Neuroreport,1997 ,8(17) :3809 — 3815.

引证文献11

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部