期刊文献+

藏-汉-英三语者言语产生中的词汇选择机制 被引量:40

The lexical selection mechanism in language production: Evidence from Tibetan-Mandarin-English trilinguals
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究通过考察图片命名任务中的语码切换代价,探讨藏-汉-英三语者言语产生中的词汇选择机制。结果表明:(1)藏-汉-英三语者用藏语和汉语命名图片时,不存在切换代价的不对称性;用藏语-英语、汉语-英语命名图片时,出现切换代价的不对称性,切换至熟练语言(藏语、汉语)的代价显著大于切换至相对熟练语言(英语);(2)被试选择熟练语言的词汇时,即使两种任务语言不相似,也采用特定语言选择机制;选择熟练语言与相对熟练、但不相似语言的词汇时,采用非特定语言选择机制;(3)语言熟练程度和语言相似性共同影响双语者的词汇选择机制。 This paper reports on three experiments exploring the lexical selection mechanism inlanguage production by means of tasks involving language switching and switching cost in theprocess of naming pictures. The results yield three major findings. First, when Tibetan-Mandarin-English trilinguals naming pictures in Tibetan-Mandarin, there were no asymmetricalcosts; while naming in Tibetan-English and Mandarin-English, there were asymmetrical costsand the costs to the proficient language were larger than that to other. Second, when naming inthe proficient languages, though dissimilar, the Tibetan-Mandarin-English trilinguals may usethe Language-Specific Selection Mechanims; while naming in the proficient and the lessproficient dissimilar languages, they may use the Language-nonspecific Selection Mechanims.Third, language proficiency and language similarity may both affect the bilingual’s lexicalselection mechanisms.
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期51-58,共8页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(08JJOXLX269) 广东省自然科学基金团队项目(06200524) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究项目(06JDXMXLX01) 河北省科技厅项目(054572170)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Caramazza, A. & A. Costa. 2000. The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter ? [J]. Cognition 75: 51-64.
  • 2Costa, A. & A. Caramazza. 2002. The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 46: 178-198.
  • 3Costa, A. & S. Mikel. 2004. Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners [J].Journal of Memory and Language 50: 491-511.
  • 4Costa, A., S. Mikel & I. Iva. 2006. How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and Language-Specific Selection Mechanisms are both functional [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 32, 5: 1057-1074.
  • 5Gerver, D. 1974. Simultaneous listening and speaking and retention of prose [J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 26: 337-341.
  • 6Glaser, W. R.& F. J. Dungelhoff. 1984. The time course of picture-word interference [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology': Human Perception and Performance 10: 640-654.
  • 7Green, D. W. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system [ J ]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1 : 67-81.
  • 8Grosjean, F. 1988. Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 3: 233-274.
  • 9La Heij, W. 1988. Components of Stroop-like interference in picture-naming [J]. Memory & Cognition 16: 400-410.
  • 10Meuter, R. F. I. & A. Allport. 1999. Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 25-40.

同被引文献689

引证文献40

二级引证文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部