期刊文献+

欧盟委员会与公民社会关系的变迁与反思 被引量:2

Reflections on the Transformation of the Relationships between the European Commission and the Civil Society
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着欧盟治理的民主合法性危机的突显,欧盟委员会积极地把公民社会组织纳入欧盟政治过程中。本文通过对欧盟委员会有关公民社会的文件的系统分析,指出欧盟委员会与公民社会(组织)之间的关系近年来发生了变迁,这主要体现在:一方面,欧盟委员会从只关注咨询利益集团,转而突出广义的公民社会组织乃至"相关各方"的纳入;另一方面,从只关注公民社会组织的提供信息和专家知识的作用,也就是说对输出合法性的贡献,转而突出公民社会组织的参与对消除欧盟"民主赤字"、促进欧盟治理的输入合法性的作用。最后,文章对欧盟委员会纳入战略中存在的问题,诸如促进参与民主的真实性、公民社会组织概念的泛化与空洞化以及公民社会组织的代表性等,进行了批评性评价。 With the revelation of the democratic legitimacy crisis of the EU Governance,the European Commission has been engaged actively in involving the civil society into the EU political process. Through a systematic analysis of the European Commission's documents concerning the civil society,this article points out that the relations between the European Commission and the civil society have changed in recent years in a twofold way. On the one hand,the European Commission turns from paying attention only to consulting the special interest groups to emphasising the involvement of the widely defined civil society and even of all the 'interested parties'. On the other hand,instead of attaching importance only to the functions of the civil society to provide information and expert knowledge,in other words,to its contribution to the output legitimacy,the European Commission turns to emphasise its contribution to eliminating the EU's democratic deficit and to promoting the input legitimacy of the EU Governance. This article finally gives a critical assessment of the existing problems in the European Commission's involving strategy,such as the authenticity of participatory democracy,the wide-ranged but empty concept of civil society as well as its representativity,and so on.
作者 郑春荣
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期126-139,共14页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金 “同济大学促进对德学术交流基金”的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1Fritz W. Scharpf, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 2Fritz W. Scharpf, "Democratic Policy in Europe", European Law Journal, Vol. 2,No.2.1996.
  • 3Michael Haus et al. , Partizipation und Fuhrung in der lokalen Politik, Baden -Baden: NOMOS, 2005, pp. 19 -20.
  • 4European Commission, "European Governance. A White Paper", COM (2001) 428 final, 2001.
  • 5Stijn Smismans, The Constitutional Labelling of ' The Democratic Life of the EU' : Representative and Participatory Democracy, in Andreas Foltesdal and Lynn Dobson eds. , Political Theory and the European Constitution, London: Routledge, 2004, pp. 122 - 138.
  • 6See Stijn Smismans, European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests, Europnan Law Journal. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 473-495.
  • 7European Commission, "Commission Communication, An Open and Structured Dialogue between theCommission and Special Interest Groups (SEC (92) 2272 final)", Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities 93/C 63/02.
  • 8Sonia Mazey and Jeremy Richardson eds. , Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 1993 .
  • 9Sonia Mazey and Jeremy Richardson, " The Commission and the Lobby", in Geoffrey Ed- wards and David Spence eds. , The European Commission, London: Longman, 1997, pp. 169 -187.
  • 10Thomas Schaber,The Regulation of Lobbying at the European Parliament: The Quest for Transparency, in Paul H. Claeys et al. eds. , Lobbying, Pluralism and European Integration, Brussels : European Interuniversity Press, 1998, pp. 208 -221.

二级参考文献49

  • 1Beate Kohler-Koeh and Berthold Rittberger eds. , Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union, Lanham: Roman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.
  • 2Beate Kohler-Koch and Berthold Rittberger,"The ' Governance Turn' in EU Studies", Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44 ( Supplement 1 ) ,2006, pp. 36 - 37.
  • 3Fritz W. Scharpf, "Die Politikverflechtungsfalle. Europaische Integration und deutscher Foderalismus im Verglelch", Polltische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1985, p. 324.
  • 4Wolfgang Streeck,“Politikverfleehtung und Entscheidungslucke: Zum Verhaltnis von zwischenstaatlichen Beziehungen und sozialen Interessen im europaischen Binnenmarkt”, in Karlheinz Bentele et al, eds. , Die Reformfahigkeit von Industriegesellschaften. Fritz W. Scharpf Festschrift zu seinem 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus Verlag, 1995, pp. 115 - 116.
  • 5http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_dialogue/docs/laeken01_en. pdf, 2007 年12月7日访问.
  • 6European Commission, "European Govemance-A White Paper", COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels, 2001.
  • 7European Commission, "Communication from the Commission. Towards a Reinforced Culture of Consultation and Dialogue - General Principles and Minimum Standards for Consultation of Interested Parties by the Commission", COM (2002) 704 final, Brussels, 20020
  • 8The Economic and Social Committee, "The Role and Contribution of Civil Society Organisations in the Building of Europe', CES 851/99 D/GW, Brussels, 1999, pt. 9.4.
  • 9European Commission, Report from the Commission on European Governance, COM (2002) 705 final, Brussels, 2002,pt. 3.1.3.
  • 10The Economic and Social Committee, Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on ' European Governance-A White Paper' ,COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities C 125/61, 2002, pt. 4.2.6.

共引文献5

同被引文献43

引证文献2

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部