期刊文献+

宏观调控主体法律责任的性质 被引量:9

原文传递
导出
摘要 宏观调控主体的法律责任是宏观调控法律关系中的调控主体违反宏观调控法律设定的义务所应付出的代价。宏观调控主体法律责任包括宏观调控决策主体的法律责任和执行主体的法律责任两类。直接以宏观调控决策造成损害后果或以其对宏观经济形势不起效果为依据来设定决策主体的法律责任承担是不合理的,相反,宏观调控决策法律责任主要是当决策主体违反宏观调控法定决策程序时所导致的法律责任;宏观调控执行法律责任的设定虽然可直接以责任主体的行为造成的损害后果为依据,但其实质上也应该是一种程序违法责任。
作者 张德峰
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期181-186,共6页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献74

  • 1Louis Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action. Little, Brown. 1965, pp. 176-192.
  • 2H. M. F. , III, Judicial Control of Administrative Inaction: Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. , v.Ruckelshaus. Virginia Law Review, vol. 57, 1971, pp. 676-705, at p. 679.
  • 3Jane Convey, Public or Private? Duty of Care in a Statutory Framwork: Stovin v. Wise in the Houseof Lords. Modern Law Review, vol. 60, 1997, pp. 559-571.
  • 4Dawn Oliver, Common Values and Public-Private Divided. Op. Cit. , p. 26.
  • 5W. L. Morison, A Re-examination of the Duty of Care. Modern Law Review, vol 11, 1948, pp.9-35.
  • 6See Jeffery G. Macintosh,Designing and Efficient Fiduciary Duty. University of Toronoto Law Journal,vol. 43, 1993, pp. 425-473.
  • 7Paul L. Davies, Gower and Davies'Principles of Modern Company Law. 7th edition, London:Sweet & Maxwell, 2003, p. 164.
  • 8R. A. Percy and C. T. Walton,Charlesworth & Percy on Negligence.Ninth edition, London:Sweet & Maxwell, 1997, p. 125.
  • 9Stuart R. Cohn, Demise of the Director's Duty of Care:Judicial Avoidance of Standards and Sanctions through the Business Judgment Rule.Texas Law Review, vol. 62, 1983, pp.591-637, at p. 596.
  • 10Robert C. Clark, Corporate Law. Aspen Law & Business, 1986,pp. 129-136

共引文献55

同被引文献107

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部