期刊文献+

用生命质量测定方法评价输卵管结扎手术质量 被引量:2

Evaluation Operation of Tubal Ligation Quality Using Life Quality Method.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用生命质量观点与方法,从身体、心理、家庭、社会等各方面,考察采用节育措施者生命活动的质量状况,评价手术效果,比单纯用临床指标,更全面、更有意义。本文用病例对照方法,从生命质量总体水平、各维度水平、主观感受、节育前后生命质量变化情况等各方面,对输卵管结扎术后妇女与放置宫内节育器、口服或外用避孕药具的妇女作比较分析。结果:在生命质量总体水平、各维度水平及主观感受总体水平上,三种节育措施者之间均无区别,而输卵管结扎者比其他两组对节育措施有较多的精神负担。 From life quality point of view, included physical, psychological, family and social, the subject's quality condition of life was observed, the operative effect was estmated. This method was more comprehensive more significance, compared with only in clinical observation.This paper compared and analyzed in population level of life quality, levels of all dimensions, subjective experience, the change of life quality around birth control by the case control study. The result showed compared three birth control, there were no significant difference in population level of life quality, levels of all dimensions, population level of subjective experience, but the women used ligation of oviduct had more a load on one's mind than others.
出处 《中国计划生育学杂志》 1998年第2期61-64,共4页 Chinese Journal of Family Planning
关键词 生命质量 输卵管结扎 病例对照研究 Life quality Operation of tubal ligation Case control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献2

共引文献262

同被引文献29

  • 1宋爱芹,谢楠.SF-36评价人群生命质量研究概况[J].济宁医学院学报,2005,28(3):75-76. 被引量:10
  • 2刘立亚,舒向俊.皮埋避孕法的副反应对使用者生命质量的影响[J].华夏医学,2006,19(1):152-154. 被引量:2
  • 3United Nations, Population Division.World Contraceptive Use 2007. New York: United Nations Dept. for Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2008[EB/OL]. http: //www.tm.org/esa/population/publieations/contraeeptive2007/contraceptive2007, 2008.
  • 4Higham JM, O' brien PM, Show RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart [J]. Br J Obstet Gyneco, 1 1990, 8 (97): 734-739.
  • 5Jassen CA, Schohen PC, Heinta AP. A simple visual assessment technique to discriminate between menorrhagia and normal menstrual blood loss [J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995, 85 (6) : 977- 982.
  • 6Ware JE.SF-36 Health Survey Update[J]. Spine, 2000, 25 (24) : 3130-3139.
  • 7Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care [J].BMJ, 1992, 305 (6846): 160-164.
  • 8Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, et al. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS[J]. BMJ, 1993, 306 (6890): 1440-1444.
  • 9UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/HRP. Progress in Reproductive Health Research[J], progress, 2002, 60: 1-7.
  • 10Thonneau P, Goulard H, Goyaux N. Risk factors for intrauterine device failure: a review [J], Contraception, 2001, 64 (1): 33- 37.

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部