期刊文献+

东亚模式视角下台湾与大陆发展模式异同研究 被引量:2

Taiwan and inland development mode's differecne research basing on Asian mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国台湾模式和大陆模式本质上同属于东亚模式,本文在东亚模式的视角下,对台湾与大陆发展模式的异同进行了研究,并分析了中国台湾地区模式与大陆模式异同的原因,对促进台湾与大陆经济合作及发展有一定现实意义。 Both Taiwan Residents model and the Mainland model belong to the East Asian model essentially. From the point-view of the East Asian model, this paper has done certain research on the similarities and differences between Taiwan Residents model and the Mainland model. Through analyzing the reasons that cause such similarities and differences, it thus serves underscoring the practical significance of boosting the economical cooperation and development between Taiwan and the Mainland.
出处 《特区经济》 北大核心 2009年第2期109-111,共3页 Special Zone Economy
关键词 东亚模式 台湾模武 大陆模武 MMED模型 产业结构 East Asian model Taiwan Residents model the Mainland model MMED model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1莫里斯·斯科特.“台湾的贸易发展”,薛琦主编.《台湾对外贸易发展论文集》,[M]联经出版事业公司,1994年版,第16页.
  • 2Abramovitz, M. , 1993, “The Search for the Sources of Growth: Area of Ignorance, Old and New”, Journal of Economic History, 53 (June) : 217-243.
  • 3Bhagwati, J., 1996, The Miracle That Did Happen: Understanding East Asia in Comparative Perspective, Keynote Speech Delivered at Cornell University on the Occasion of Conference on Government and Market: The Relevance of the Taiwan Residents Performance to Development Theory and Policy in honor of Professor Liu and Tsiang.
  • 4Baumol, W.J., 1967, Business Behavior, Value and Growth, Rev. Ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • 5Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and E.W. Diewert, 1982a, Multilateral Comparison of Output, Input and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers, Economic Journal 92, No.365 (March) : 73-86.
  • 6Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and E.W. Diewert, 1982b, The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Output, Input and Productivity, Econometrica 50, No.6 (Noverber) : 1393-1414.
  • 7Chen, E.K.Y., 1997, “The Total Factor Productivity Debate: Determinants of Economic Growth in East Asia”, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature. 11 (1) pp 18-38, 54-70.
  • 8Christensen, L., D. Cummings, and D. W. Jorgenson, 1980, “Economic Growth, 1947-1973: An International Comparison”, in New Development in Productivity Measurement, eds. J. W. Kendriek and B. Vaeeara, 595-698. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • 9Copeland, M.A., 1937, Concepts of National Income, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 1 New York, NBER, 3-61.
  • 10Copeland, M.A. and E.M. Martin, 1938, The Correction of Wealth and Income Estimates for Price Changes, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol.2 New York, NBER, 85-135.

共引文献287

同被引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部