期刊文献+

国际法的性质与效力依据:新视角下的再考量 被引量:5

The Nature and Foundation of Binding Force of International Law:In a New Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在新的世纪,国际法的基本理论需要进一步创新与发展。对自然国际法的扬弃,以及对国际法的一分为二,是再考量国际法性质与效力依据的基本前提。自然国际法与实在国际法存在互动关系,自然国际法决定着实在国际法,实在国际法反作用于自然国际法。自然国际法对国际社会成员具有抽象的拘束力,国际法的拘束力完整地体现为自然国际法的抽象拘束力与实在国际法的具体拘束力的结合。国际法是法,特别是在纳入自然国际法之后,国际法将成为完备的、自成体系的、具有形式合理性的法。自然国际法的效力来自国际社会规律;实在国际法的效力来自各国意志的协调。自然国际法的效力依据决定了实在国际法的效力依据。 In the new century,the foundational theory of international law needs further creation and development.The sublation of natural international law and the dichotomy of international law are the two basic premises to reconsider the nature and foundation of binding force of international law.Natural international law and positive international law have interactive relations with the former dominating the latter while the latter reacting to the former.Natural international law has abstract binding force on the members of international society,and the binding force of international law is the combination of that of natural international law and positive international law.International law is law,especially after it has included natural international law.With new component,International law will become a perfect,systematic law with reasonable forms.The binding force of natural international law comes from the laws of international society,while that of positive international law comes from the agreement of the will of nations.The foundation of binding force of natural international law decides that of positive international law.
作者 罗国强
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期51-57,共7页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 国际法 性质 效力依据 International Law,Nature,Foundation of Binding Force
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1John Austin, Lectures on Jurisprudence, or the Philosophy of Positive Law, London: Schloarly Press Inc. , 1977.
  • 2Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations The Struggle For Power and Peace, Alfred A. Knopf Inc. , 1985.
  • 3Lauterpacht, International Law, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 2, Part Ⅰ, 1975, p.5.
  • 4Triepel, Les rapports entre le droit interne et le droit international, Recueil des cours, Vol. 1, 1923, p. 84;
  • 5Lauterpacht, International Law, Cambridge University Press,Vol. 2, Part Ⅰ, 1975, pp. 8 - 14.
  • 6Oppenheim's International Law, 9th edition, Vol. 1, Longman, 1996, pp. 8 - 13.
  • 7李浩培著.《国际法的概念与渊源》,贵州人民出版社,1994年版,第5—6.
  • 8Jack L. Goldsmith and Erie A. Posner, The Limits of International Law, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 202 - 203.
  • 9Nieo Krisch, Hierarchy, Equality and US Predominance, Michael Byers and Georg Nolte edited, United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 156.
  • 10also David D. Caron, The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council, AJIL, Vo. 87, Washington DC : 1993, pp. 552 - 588.

二级参考文献27

  • 1黄进.宏观国际法学论[J].法学评论,1984,2(2):38-42. 被引量:15
  • 2张乃根.《西方法哲学史纲》(增补本),中国政法大学出版社21302年版,第69,144页.
  • 3恩格斯.《路德维希·费尔巴哈和德国古典哲学的终结》[A]..《马克思恩格斯选集》(第4卷)[C].人民出版社,1995年版.第251页.
  • 4.《马克思恩格斯全集》(第1卷)[M].人民出版社,1995年版.270页.
  • 5梅因 沈景一 译.《古代法》[M].商务印书馆,1996年版.第97页.
  • 6.《老子》第25章[M].,..
  • 7菲德罗斯等.《国际法》,李浩培译,商务印书馆,1981年版,第229页.
  • 8See Cicero, On the Commonwealth, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1976, pp. 197 -216.
  • 9See The Institutes of Justinian, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1949, pp. 3 -14.
  • 10See Hugo Grotius, De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, London: Oxford, 1925, pp. 39 -40.

共引文献25

同被引文献86

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部