期刊文献+

宫腔镜手术两种静脉麻醉方法的研究 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较丙泊酚复合芬太尼和丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼两种麻醉方法用于宫腔镜手术的安全性和有效性。方法:选取ASA Ⅰ级~Ⅱ级、无禁忌证、自愿接受宫腔镜手术的患者60例,随机分为丙泊酚+芬太尼组(PF组)和丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼组(PR组)两组,每组各30例。观察麻醉前、麻醉起效、扩宫颈、术中、术毕清醒各时点的HR、MAP、RR、Sp02变化,并记录起效时间、恢复时间、准确定向恢复时间、术中体动(程度和次数)、术后镇痛效果、呼吸抑制、术后并发症发生情况。结果:麻醉起效后两组HR、MAP、RR、SPO2均显著下降,术毕逐渐恢复到术前水平,两组间无显著差异;PR组麻醉起效时间、恢复时间及准确定向恢复时间均显著短于PF组(P〈0.01);PR组丙泊酚总用量、术中体动、麻醉不满意发生率、术后嗜唾发生率均显著低于PF组(P〈0.05);PR组苏醒后5min的VRS评级和术后宫缩痛发生率显著高于PF组(P〈0.05)。结论:宫腔镜手术中,丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼在麻醉效果和降低不良反应发生方面优于丙泊酚复合芬太尼,是一种安全优良宫腔镜手术麻醉方法。
出处 《长治医学院学报》 2009年第1期50-52,共3页 Journal of Changzhi Medical College
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Troy AM, Huthinson RC, Kenny GNC, et al. Treacheal intubating conditions using proprfol and remifentanil target-controlled infudions. Anaesthesia, 2002,57:1204-1207.
  • 2Crankshaw DP, Chan C, Leslie K, et al. Remifentanil concentration during target-controlled infusion propofol. Anesth Intensive Care, 2002, 30:578-583.
  • 3Wakeline HG, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, et al. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration of propofol: what predicts loss of consciousness? Anesthesiology, 1999,90:92-97.
  • 4Glen JB. Quality ofanesthesia during spontaneous respiration a proposed scoring system. Anaesthesia, 1991,46: 1081-1082.
  • 5Aldrate AJ, Kroulik D. A post anaesthetic recovery score. Anaesth Analg, 1970,49:923-924.
  • 6Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharmaceutics, 1992,20:147-169.
  • 7Jacobs JR, Williams EA. Algorithms to control effect compartment drug concentrations in pharmacokinetic model-driven drug delivery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1993,40:993-999.
  • 8Kim DW, Kil HY, White PF. Relationship between clinical endpoints for induction of anesthesia and bispectral index and effect-site concentration values. J Clin Anesth, 2002,14:241-245.
  • 9Drummond JC. Monitoring depth of anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 2000,93:876-882.
  • 10Struys MR, Tom DS, Birgit D, et al. Comparison of plasma comp ̄artment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:399-406.

共引文献863

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部