摘要
六家本系统的明州本不仅仅有删略李善注的情形,而且也有删略五臣注的地方。对五臣注的删略有些部分以校语的形式"明删",有些部分则是径直删去的"暗删",不做任何说明。删略的五臣注,与保存的注释都有所差别,个别甚至差别较大。在贯彻秀州本删注体例方面,明州本又作了进一步发挥,有些已经超出了体例本身的范围。由此,对五臣注的学术评价更需要考虑注释的删减现象并由此造成的五臣地位的进一步降低的情况。
Among the six versions, Mingzhou version of Wen Xuan exists the deletions of Li Shan's annotation, but also that of the Five Ministers'. Regarding the deletion of the Five Ministers' annotation, some are "explicit deletion" appeared as collating and notating materials, and some are "implicit deletion", deleted without illustration. Annotations made by the Five Ministers are deleted, among which some are greatly different from the preserved ones. However, Mingzhou version further develops the style of deleting annotations in Xiuzhou version, and even exceeds its range. Thus, the annotation deletions and the lower status caused consequently should be taken into consideration when we are making academic evaluations on the annotations made by the Five Ministers.
出处
《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2009年第2期93-96,共4页
Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
明州本《文选》
删注
五臣注
Mingzhou version of Wen Xuan
annotation deletion
annotations made by Five Ministers