期刊文献+

逻辑研究:本质的反思与理论的风险

Logic Research: Recollection to Essence and the Risk of Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 古代逻辑源于对辩论传统中真实论证的研究,但是之后数个世纪,这门学科变得高度抽象化和理论化。高度抽象化、理论化的背后潜伏着某些风险:距离普通人越来越远;与数学的界限越来越模糊;学科界定的错位。逻辑研究将何去何从?逻辑的目的是如何使我们有效地思维,从而做出对与错的判定,逻辑研究也应该回归到这一普遍的意义上来,唯有如此,逻辑才能走入大众,逻辑的力量才能得到彰显。 The ancient logic originated in centuries later, it becomes highly abstract and risks, they are farther and farther away from boundary, and the definition of it is misplaced. us think effectively, making a judgment for the significance, only like this, logic can go to the the study at proving the truth in traditional argument, several theoretical. The high abstractness and theorization hide some the common people, more and more indistinct to What will logic research do? The purpose of logic is right or wrong. Logic research should return to this public, showing the force of it.
作者 廖德明
出处 《毕节学院学报(综合版)》 2009年第1期55-58,共4页 Journal of Bijie University
关键词 逻辑 真实论证 思维 Logic Proving the Truth Thinking teaching to make common
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1J.van Benthem.Where is Logic Going,and Should It?[].What is to be Done in Philosophy?.2007
  • 2.
  • 3J.van Benthem.Cognition as Interaction[]..2007
  • 4J.van Benthem.Logic Games:not just tools,but model of interaction[]..2007
  • 5Putnam,H.,Ketner,K.L.,Kenneth Laine,Ketner.Introduction[].Reasoning and the Logic of Things The Cambridge Conference Lectures of /Charles Sanders Peirce.1992
  • 6Parikh,R.The logic of games and its applications[].Annals of Discrete Mathematics.1985

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部