期刊文献+

试论钱穆与余英时的儒学观

Qianmu and Yu Yingshi's View—— on the connection between Qianmu, YuYingshi of Confucianism and Modern New Confucianists
下载PDF
导出
摘要 钱穆、余英时以史学立场为学术路向论述儒学,他们不仅推崇宋明理学,而且对于清代"道问学"精神评价甚高,并指出宋明与清代之间存在学术渊源。这与现代新儒家独尊宋明理学,语垢清代学术的哲学立场不无抵牾。然而,就其复兴儒学和寻求传统文化的现代转型来看,他们仍然相互同情,心有戚戚焉。因此,钱、余与现代新儒家虽"道不同不相为谋",但仍可被视为20世纪复兴儒学这一学术思潮的新儒家。 Qianmu and Yu Yingshi discussed the congfucianism in a historical view. They not only canonized the moral law in Song - Ming Dynasties, but also sang high praise for the spirit of "Daowenxue". Furthermore, they believed there was academic relation between Song- Ming Dynasties and Qing Dynasty. On the contrary, Modern new confucianists only thought highly of the moral law in Song - Ming Dynasties. But during the course of confucianism' s revival and the modern turnaround of traditional culture, the both sides sympathized each other deeply. Therefore, Qianmu, Yu Yingshi and Modern new confucianists should be considered as new confucianists of the trend of Confucianism in the 20th century, though they both alleged that their Confucianism views were not the same.
作者 李如涛 唐玉
出处 《淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2009年第1期40-44,共5页 Journal of Huaibei Coal Industry Teachers‘ College:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 钱穆 余英时 儒学观 现代新儒家 尊德性 道问学 Qianmu Yu Yingshi Confucianism views modern new confucianist Zundexing Daowenxue
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1李泽厚.中国思想史论下[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1999.
  • 2何俊.推陈出新与守先待后——从朱熹研究论余英时的儒学观[J].学术月刊,2006,38(7):61-68. 被引量:5
  • 3陈祖武.清儒学术拾零[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1999..
  • 4刘师培,章太炎.中国近三百年学术史论[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2006.
  • 5钱穆.中国学术通义[M].台北:学生书局,1975.
  • 6.《论戴震与章学诚》.,.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部