期刊文献+

64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠状动脉粥样硬化病变的诊断准确性评价 被引量:8

Accuracy of 64-slice Multi-detector Row CT Angiography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像(CTA)对冠状动脉粥样硬化病变的诊断价值。方法收集2006年7月至2007年5月在我院行64层螺旋CTA和传统冠状动脉造影(SCA)的49例患者的影像资料,以SCA作对照,评估64层螺旋CTA诊断冠状动脉狭窄性病变的准确性。结果其中46例图像(93.88%,46/49)达到诊断标准,64层螺旋CTA诊断冠状动脉〈50%、50%~75%、≥75%狭窄性病变敏感性分别为54.88%、47.50%、93.15%,特异性分别为99.42%、95.68%、97.13%。64层螺旋CTA和SCA对冠状动脉狭窄的量化分析具有明显的相关性(r=0.941,P〈0.01)。结论64层螺旋CTA是评价冠状动脉粥样硬化病变的一种较好的检查方法。 Objective To determine the accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery lesions. Methods We retrospectively collected the coronary artery imaging data of 49 patients who underwent 64-slice CTA and conventional catheter-based selective coronary angiography (SCA) during July 2006 and May 2007. The CTA and SCA diagnosis were compared. Results The 64-slice CTA enabled the visualization of the entire coronary tree with diagnostic image quality in 46 of the 49 patients. The CTA had a sensitivity of 54.88%, 47.50% and 93.15%, and a specificity of 99.42%, 95.68% and 97.13% for detecting less than 50% stenosis, 50%-75% stenosis, and greater than 75% stenosis, respectively. The overall Pearson's correlation coefficient between the degree of stenosis detected by quantitative SCA and 64-slice CTA was 0. 941. Conclusion 64-slice CTA is a good instrument for assessing coronary artery lesions.
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期307-310,共4页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机冠状血管造影术 冠状动脉疾病 Tomography, X-ray computed Coronary angiography Coronary artery disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995. Eur Heart J, 1999, 20(7) :484-495.
  • 2Kuetmer A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004,43(5) :831-839.
  • 3Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, etal. Predictive value of 16-sliee multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segmentbased analysis. Circulation, 2004 , 110(17) :2638-2643.
  • 4Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, et al. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation, 1975 , 52 (6) : 979-986.
  • 5Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics, 2004,24(3): 2787-800.
  • 6Pannu HK, Jacobs JE, Lai S, etal. Coronary CT angiography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility. AJR, 2006, 187(1) : 119-126.
  • 7Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N, et al. Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Invest Radiol, 2001,36(5) :250-256.
  • 8Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemie heart disease. AJR, 2006,187 (1) 111-117.
  • 9Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46(1) :147-154.
  • 10Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, et al. Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. Radiology, 2001,221(3) :683-688.

同被引文献159

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部