期刊文献+

基于反事实分析的产业损害幅度计算方法及CADIC扩展模型 被引量:5

The Industrial Injury Margin in Anti-Dumping and CADIC Extended Model Based on Counterfactual Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产业损害幅度是反倾销实践过程中量化进口国国内产业受损程度的关键性指标,是调查机关确定反倾销税率的重要依据.基于反事实研究方法,在CADIC模型的基础上做进一步扩展,将评估范围从单指标扩展到多指标,并采用AHP层次分析法对多指标评估进行了综合.研究表明,扩展后的模型能够适用于反倾销实践过程中产业损害幅度的确定. Injury margin is a key index in calculating the degree of suffering of domestic industry in the application of antidumping, and an important gist on the decision of antidumping tax. Based on methods of counter-fact, some analysis in extending the CADIC mode are given by considering more factors, using method of AHP to colligate. It is shown in conclusion that the extending mode can be applied in calculating the injury margin in the antidumping practice, well quantifying the suffering of the domestic industry all-sided.
作者 赵飞 何海燕
出处 《北京理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期181-184,188,共5页 Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573011)
关键词 反倾销 产业损害幅度 反事实方法 产业损害判定 CADIC模型 anti-dumping industry injury margin counter factual method determination of industry injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Boltuck R. Assessing the effects on the domestic injury of price dumping[M]. Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.
  • 2Kelly K H, Morkre M E. One lump or two: unitary versus bifurcated measures of injury at the USITC[R]. [S. l.]: Bureau of Economics Federal Trade Commission, 2006.
  • 3Prusa T J, Sharp D C. Simultaneous equations in anti-dumping investigation[J]. Journal of Forensic Economics, 2001,14(1); 63-78.
  • 4Durling J P, McCullough M P. Teaching old laws new tricks., the legal obligation of non-attribution and the need for economic rigor in injury analyses under us trade law[M]. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004.
  • 5Sharp D, Zantow K. Attribution of injury in the shrimp antidumping case: a simultaneous equations approach [J]. Economics Bulletin, 2005,6(5):1 - 10.
  • 6Vermulst E. The 10 major problems with the antidumping instrument in the European community[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2005,2(1) :105 - 11.
  • 7Tharakan P K M, Greenaway D, Kerstens B. Anti-dumping and excess injury margins in the European Uniom a counterfactual analysis[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2006,22(3) :653 - 674.
  • 8何海燕.反倾销中产业损害幅度测算指标体系的建构[J].价值工程,2003(3):2-4. 被引量:20
  • 9王明明,隋伟莹.多层模糊综合评判方法在损害分析中的应用[J].北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(3):102-104. 被引量:10
  • 10寇琳.一种基于灰色模型的反倾销产业损害状况评判方法[J].广西财政高等专科学校学报,2005,18(3):76-79. 被引量:8

二级参考文献32

共引文献30

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部