期刊文献+

基于小波分析的多期夏普比率及实证研究 被引量:5

Multi-horizon Sharpe Ratios Based on Wavelet Analysis and Empirical Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用风险价值代替标准差作为夏普比率中投资组合风险的度量,并应用修正的VaR计算方法解决收益率序列非正态分布时的风险度量问题。进一步地将小波分析引入夏普比率,利用小波函数的尺度变化与不同的投资期限相对应,建立了基于小波分析的多期夏普比率评价模型,并以我国经济背景为依托,选择上证八只封闭式基金进行研究。结果表明,把小波分析引入夏普比率可以解决投资组合业绩的多期评价问题。 Standard deviation in Sharpe Ratio is substituted with VaR and a calculation method of modified VaR is used to solve problems of evaluation when returns are not distributed normally.On second thoughts,Multi-horizon Sharpe Ratio model is established using wavelet analysis in Sharpe Ratio through making different scale of wavelet function match different horizon.Based on the background of domestic economy,the result of eight funds of Shanghai equity market shows that Sharpe Ratio using wavelet analysis can derive multi-horizon evaluation to performances of portfolios.
作者 金秀 刘洋
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期154-157,共4页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771023)
关键词 多期业绩评价 夏普比率 小波分析 MVaR multi-horizon evaluation Sharpe ratio wavelet analysis MVaR
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Sharpe WF. The Sharpe ratio [ J ]. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1994, 21(1) :49 - 59.
  • 2Mahdavi M. Risk-adjusted return when returns are not normally distributed: Adjusted Sharpe ratio [ J ]. Journal of Alternative Investments, 2004,6(4) :47 - 57.
  • 3Andrew WL. The statistics of Sharpe ratios [J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2002, 58(4) :36 - 52.
  • 4Grageriou GN, Gueyie JP. Risk-adjusted performance of funds of hedge funds using a modified Sharpe ratio[J].Journal of Wealth Management, 2003,6 ( 3 ) : 77 - 83.
  • 5Knight J, Satchen S. A re-examination of Sharpe's ratio for log normal Prices [ J ]. Applied Mathematical Finance, 2005,12 ( 1 ) : 87 - 100
  • 6Bao Y, Ullah A. Moments of the estimated Sharpe ratio when the observations are not ⅡD[ J ]. Finance Research Letters,2006,3 ( 1 ) :49 - 56.
  • 7Ziemba W T. The symmetric downside-risk Sharpe ratio [ J ]. CFA Digest,2006,36(2) :83 - 85.
  • 8高全胜.基于相容风险测度的结构夏普比率[J].深圳大学学报(理工版),2005,22(4):310-315. 被引量:4
  • 9Levy H. Portfolio performance and the investment horizon [ J ]. Management Science, 1972,18(12) : 645 - 653.
  • 10Cornish E, Fisher R. Moments and cumulates in the specification of distributions [ J ]. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 1937 : 307 - 320.

二级参考文献7

  • 1BredowHR.风险价值,期望跳与边际风险(英文版)[EB/OL].http:∥www.wifak.uni-wuerzburg.de/bwl4/amen/bredow2. htm,2002-11-05.
  • 2FischerT.基于单边矩的相容风险测度的风险资本分配(英文版)[EB/OL].http:∥www.m4.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/ m4/pers/tasche/riskcon.pdf,2003-03-16.
  • 3RockafellarT UryasevS.条件风险价值的优化方法[J].风险:英文版,2000,22(2):21-41.
  • 4ArtznerP DelbaenF EberM.相容风险测度[J].数理金融:英文版,1999,22(4):203-228.
  • 5AcekbiC TascheD.关于期望跳的相容性[J].银行与金融杂志:英文版,2002,26(7):1487-1503.
  • 6GoemannWN IngersollJE.削平夏普比率(英文版)[EB/OL].http:∥www.ssrn.com/abstract.id=302815,2002-10-04.
  • 7AlexanderGJ AlexandreM.运用风险价值进行投资绩效评估[J].投资组合管理杂志:英文版,2003,29(4):93-102.

共引文献3

同被引文献49

  • 1吕之安,李少育.宏观经济政策与企业资产配置有效性:基于夏普率的分析[J].世界经济,2021(1):151-173. 被引量:4
  • 2于春霞.我国资本市场间的动态相关性分析及风险管理[J].中国商界,2009(3):1-3. 被引量:1
  • 3高全胜.基于相容风险测度的结构夏普比率[J].深圳大学学报(理工版),2005,22(4):310-315. 被引量:4
  • 4宋红雨.夏普比率在投资管理中的应用探索[J].统计与决策,2006,22(24):107-109. 被引量:6
  • 5Jobson J D, Korkie B M o Performance hypothesis testing with the sharpe and treynor measures[J].Journal of Finance, 1981,4 : 889-908.
  • 6Cvitanic J, Lazrak A, Wang T. Implications of the Sharpe ratio as a performance measure in multi- period settings[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2008,32(5) : 1622-1649.
  • 7Bangia A, et al. Modeling liquidity risk with implications for traditional market risk measurement and management[Z]. The Wharton Financial Institutions Center, 1999 : 98- 109.
  • 8Hisata Y, Yamai Y. Research toward the practical application of liquidity risk evaluation methods[Z]. Bank of Japan,2000:48-65.
  • 9Francois-Heude A, Van Wynendaele P. Integrating liquidity risk in a parametric intraday VaR framework [Z]. 7th Bergian Financial Research Forum, Liege, 2002.
  • 10Engle R, Ferstenberg R. Is execution risk the same as investment risk? [Z]. Morgan Stanley and New York University, 2006. National Bureau of Economic.

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部