摘要
"婚内强奸"问题有三个层次的深入探讨,为了将问题阐释得更加深入和清晰,笔者仅从第二层次即司法实践中是否将"婚内强奸"进行定性的角度进行非罪化的反向论证,并将司法机关在"婚内强奸"行为定性中的作用进行表述和推进,同时将特殊正当防卫问题和"婚内强奸"定性相关的实践问题(如,取证问题、保护问题、预防问题、司法建议问题等)进行一一厘清,试图为"婚内强奸"的司法实践定性提供一个可供参考的文本。
The question of ＂marital rape＂ can be categorized into three levels. In order to explain it more thoroughly and clearly, the author carries on the non - crime＇ s reverse proof only from the second level whether to carry on the qualitative angle in the judicial practice. Meanwhile, this paper makes an indication and pushes on the qualitafive role of the judicial office in the behavior of marital rape. At the same time, it makes clear of the special justifiable defense and the practice question related to qualitative analysis （evidence collection question, protection question, prevention question, judicature suggested question and so on）, providing a reference text for the qualitative analysis of judicial practice.
出处
《中华女子学院学报》
2009年第1期34-38,共5页
Journal of China Women＇s University
关键词
“婚内强奸”
反向论证
司法建议
特殊正当防卫
marital rape
reverse proof
judicial suggestion
special justifiable defense
