摘要
《高唐》《神女》二赋为宋玉之作本无疑;然其"序"均非宋玉所撰,而是昭明或之前的某人摘相关著作的文字以为之。苏轼、王观国等人没有注意到这一点,故均责昭明以"玉曰‘唯唯’"以上为序,可谓责非其所当责;而持相反观点的何焯等家以《诠赋》仅就大赋说的"履端于唱序"说此,则昧于别矣,且未甚明此"序"异于彼"序"。刘大白、陆侃如诸学者否定这二赋为宋玉所作,其失主要的仍缘未明此两赋"序"与所"序"者非出同一人之手所致。
It is without a doubt that gaotang fuand shennv fuare authorized by songyu, while both of the prefaces are not composed by him but are selected by zhaoming the prince or someone else before him from books interrelated with the two fus. Sushi and wangguangno didn＇t notice this , both criticized that zhaoming mistaken the words before ＂yu replied well well＂as the prefaces --it is maybe said that they criticize at the wrong thing. Those who holds contracting ideas such as hezhao explained this according to ＂beginning with a preface＂ in annotatingfu that only concerning great fu： hezhao didn＇t recognized the difference and the clarification that this preface is different from that one. The negligence of liudabai and lukanru＇s refusingsongyu as the author is that they didn＇t notice the preface and the fus are not authorized by one.
出处
《钦州学院学报》
2009年第1期29-35,共7页
Journal of Qinzhou University
关键词
文选
宋玉
高唐赋
神女赋
序文
literary selections
songyu
gaotang fu
shengnv fu
preface
