期刊文献+

小剂量氯胺酮复合丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼用于无痛胃镜检查的效果及安全性 被引量:7

Clinical efficiency and safety of intravenous small-dose ketamine combined with remifentanil and propfol for painless gastroscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨氯胺酮复合丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼在无痛胃镜检查中的临床效果。方法将42例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级患者随机分成两组,均行胃镜检查A组采用瑞芬太尼丙泊酚麻醉,B组采用氯胺酮、瑞芬太尼麻醉。观察两组丙泊酚使用剂量,术中OAA/S评分,苏醒时间及并发症。结果丙泊酚首次剂量、总剂量A组>B组(P<0.05),两组OAA/S评分无明显差异;两组苏醒时间(出镜—呼之睁眼)无显著差异;两组窦缓(HR<60次/min)、注射痛发生率A组>B组(P<0.05),低氧血症(SpO2<90%)发生率无明显差异,两组均无术中知晓、喉痉挛、恢复期兴奋、烦躁。结论瑞芬太尼加丙泊酚麻醉可明显减慢心率,复合小剂量氯胺酮能减少丙泊酚的首次剂量和总量,不影响麻醉效果、苏醒和恢复,并明显降低窦缓和诱导期注射痛的发生,是无痛胃镜检查术较为适用的麻醉方法。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficiency and safety of intravenous ketamine combined with remifentanil and propfol for painless gastroscopy. Methods 42 ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ adult patients undergoing gastroscopy were randomly divided into the observed group and the control group with 21 patients in each . Both groups were treated with propfol and remifentanil, and the observed group combined with small-dose ketamine. The total dose of propfol, OAA/S score , recovery time and comphcafions were recorded. Results The initial , total dose and incidence of sinus bradycardia, injection pain of propfol in the observed group were significantly lower than those in the control group( P 〈0.05 ). There were no significant difference in the operative duration, OAA/S score and recovery time between the two groups. Conclusion Compared with application of remifentanil, ketamine, combined with remifen 'tanil can be used more effectively and safely in spainless gastroscopy.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第11期39-40,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
关键词 氯胺酮 丙泊酚 瑞芬太尼 胃镜检查 ketamine propofol remifentanil gastroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献12

  • 1郑清民,李师阳,肖全胜,姚伟瑜,房小斌.雷米芬太尼和丙泊酚复合麻醉用于人工流产的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):64-64. 被引量:22
  • 2Stewart JT,Warren FW,Maddox FC,et al.The stability of remifentanil hydrochloride and propofol in polypropylene syringes and polyvinylchloride bags at 22-24℃.Anesth Analg,2000,90:1450-1451.
  • 3Hindmarch I.Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs.Br J Clin Pharmacol,1980,10:189-209.
  • 4Joo HS,Perks WJ,Kataoka MT,et al.A comparison of patient-controlled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanilpropofol for shock wave lithotripsy.Anesth Analg,2001,93:1227-1232.
  • 5Davis PJ,Finkel JC,Orr RJ,et al.A randomized,double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients.Anesth Analg,2000,90:863-871.
  • 6Stewart JT,Warren FW,Maddox FC,et al.The stability of remifentanil hydrochloride and propofol in polypropylene syringes and polyvinyl chloride bags at 22°-24℃[J].Anesth Analg,2000,90:1450-1451.
  • 7Roehm KD,Piper SN,Maleck WH,et al.Prevention of propofol-induced injection pain by remifentanil:a placebo-controlled comparison with lidocaine [white star][J].Anaesthesia,2003,58:165-170.
  • 8Joo HS,Perks WJ,Kataoka MT,et al.A Comparison of Patient-Controlled Sedation Using Either Remifentanil or Remifentanil-Propofol for Shock Wave Lithotripsy[J].Anesth Analg,2001,93:1227-32.
  • 9Davis PJ,Lerman,J,Suresh S,et al.A Randomized Multicenter Study of Remifentanil Compared with Alfentanil,Isoflurane,or Propofol in Anesthetized Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Strabismus Surgery[J].Anesth Analg,1997,84:982-989.
  • 10Davis PJ,Finkel JC,Orr RJ,et al.A randomized,double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients[J].Anesth Analg,2000,9:863-871.

共引文献565

同被引文献38

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部