期刊文献+

水的酸碱度对Bradford法检测蛋白质含量的影响 被引量:5

Effect of water pH value on protein content with Bradford method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨水酸碱度的变化对Bradford法检测蛋白质含量的影响。方法用pH分别为4.0(pH=4.0组)、7.0(pH=7.0组)和10.0(pH=10.0组)的双蒸水配置Bradford法所需要的试剂,绘制标准曲线,检测标准蛋白浓度,比较水的酸碱度的变化对标准曲线的影响。结果pH=4.0组和pH=7.0组的标准曲线拟合度较pH=10.0组标准曲线拟合度明显增高;pH=4.0组和pH=7.0组检测的蛋白质含量与已知蛋白浓度相比差别无统计学意义(P>0.05);pH=10.0组检测蛋白质的含量与已知蛋白浓度、pH=7.0组和pH=4.0组相比差别均有统计学意义(P<0.05),pH=7.0组和pH=4.0组检测蛋白质含量的准确性高于pH=10.0组。结论双蒸水酸碱度的变化可以影响Bradford法检测蛋白质含量的精确度。 Objective To study the effect of water pH value on protein content with Bradford method.Methods Double distilled water with different pH(4.0,7.0 and 10.0)was used to dissolve the agents needed in Bradford method.The standard curves were made to detect the fitting situations and standard content of protein.According to the protein content,the effect of pH on standard curves was estimated.Results The fitting situations in the group of pH equaled to 7.0 and 4.0 were much better than that in the group of pH equaled to 10.0.There was no obvious difference in protein contents among the known protein concentration,pH equaled to 7.0 and 4.0 groups(P〉0.05).There was obvious difference in protein content between pH equaled to 10.0 group and pH equaled to 7.0 group,pH equaled to 4.0 group or the known protein concentration(P〈0.05).The accurate rates were higher in the pH equaled to 7.0 and 4.0 groups than those in the pH equaled to10.0 group.Conclusion The changes of water pH value could affect the accuracy of detecting protein content with Bradford method.
出处 《新乡医学院学报》 CAS 2009年第2期144-146,共3页 Journal of Xinxiang Medical University
基金 新乡医学院高学历人才资助项目(2007)
关键词 酸碱度 Bradford法 蛋白质含量 hydrogenion concentration Bradford method protein content
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1曲春香,沈颂东,王雪峰,崔永华,宋卫平.用考马斯亮蓝测定植物粗提液中可溶性蛋白质含量方法的研究[J].苏州大学学报(自然科学版),2006,22(2):82-85. 被引量:190
  • 2郭敏亮,姜涌明.考马斯亮蓝显色液组分对蛋白质测定的影响[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,1996,23(6):558-561. 被引量:104
  • 3杨钊 王凤山.小牛胸腺来源低分子免疫抑制组分的分离、纯化性质研究[D].济南:山东大学,2001.
  • 4Harris ELV, Angel S. Protein purification methods[M], London: Oxford University Press, 1989.12-18.
  • 5Krystal G, Macdonald C, Munt B, et aL. A method for quantitating nanogram amounts of soluble protein using the principle of silver binding [J]. Anal Biochem, 1985, 148: 451--460.
  • 6Jenzano JW, Hogan SL, Noyes CM, et al. Comparison of five techniques for the determination of protein content in mixell human saliva[J]. Anal Biochem, 1986, 159: 370-376.
  • 7Lowry OH,Rosebrough NJ,Farr AL,et al.Protein measurement with the Folinphenol reagent [J].J Biochem,1951,193:265 -269.
  • 8Bradford MM,A rapid and sensitive method for the quantntitation of microgram of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding[J].Anal Biochem,1976,72:248 - 254.
  • 9Peterson GL.A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al.which is more generally applicable[J].Anal Biochem,1977,83:346 - 356.
  • 10Fanger,BO.Adapation of the Bradford protein binding assay to membrane-bound proteins by solubilizing in glucopyranoside detergents[J].Anal Biochem,1987,162:11 - 17.

共引文献387

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部