期刊文献+

七方位彩色眼底照像法对糖尿病视网膜病变的诊断价值 被引量:3

Grading of 7-standard field fundus photography for diagosis of diabetic retinopathy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的筛选经济、简便、有效地糖尿病视网膜病变检查法。方法分别采用散瞳50度眼底后极部彩色照像法、美国早期糖尿病性视网膜病变治疗研究小组确立的散瞳30度眼底七方位彩色照像法和FFA法对164例(308只眼)糖尿病患者进行检查,由有经验的眼底医生按照糖尿病视网膜病变国际临床分类法对图片进行分析给出分期,对三种方法所得结果进行比较。结果散瞳50度眼底后极部彩色照像法和FFA法在DR诊断分期中一致性一般(K=O.488),七方位彩色眼底照像法和FFA法在DR诊断分期中有比较好的一致性(K=0.873)。结论七方位彩色眼底照像法可作为糖尿病视网膜病变筛查和指导治疗的一种比较可靠的方法,而散瞳50度眼底后极部彩色照像法的可靠性一般。 Objective To evaluate the ability ofmydriatic single-field 50° digital fundus photogra- phy and mydriatic 7-standard field fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR)in patients with dia- betic mellitus (DM)compared with fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA).Methods A Total of 164 diabetic patients attending a hospital-based screening clinic were recruited.Mydriatic single-field 50° digital fundus photography,mydriatic 7-standard field ETDRS fundus photography and FFA were performed using a Zeiss ff450 plus 1R fundus camera.Grading of diabetic retinopathy was carried out by two ophthalmologists with diabetic retinopathy international clinical classification.The results were evaluated and compared respectively.Re- suits Mydriafic single-field 50° digital fundus photography and FFA demonstrated moderate agreement (K =0.488).Mydriatic 7-standard field fundus photography and FFA demonstrated near perfect agreement (K =0.873).Conclusion Mydriatic 7-standard field fundus photography is an effective and clinically viable technique to screen for diabetic retinopathy among a diabetic population,Mydriatic single-field 50° digital fundus photography moderate.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期239-241,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词 糖尿病视网膜病变 诊断 彩色眼底照像法 Diabetic retinopathy Diagnosis Fundus photography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Aptel F, Denis P,Rouberol F,et al.Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.Diabetes Metab, 2008,34:189-91.
  • 2Wilkinson CP,Ferris Ⅲ FL, Klein RE,et al.Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales.Ophthalmology, 2003,110: 1677-1682.
  • 3Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms. ETDRS report number 11.Ophthalmology, 1991,98 : 807-822.
  • 4Ong GL, Ripley LG, Newsom RS, et al.Screening for sight-threating diabetic retinopathy :comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.Am J Ophthalmol,2004,137: 445-452.
  • 5Rudnisky CJ,Tennant MT,Weis E,et al.Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.Ophthalmology, 2007,114: 1748-1754.
  • 6Williams GA,Scott IU,Haller JA,et al.Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening:a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology,2004,111 : 1055-1062.
  • 7Chun DW,Bauer RM,Ward TP,et al.Evaluation of digital fundus images as a diagnostic method for surveillance of diabetic retinopathy. Military medicine, 2007,172: 405-410.
  • 8于强,刘万丽,闫宏,余斌杰.糖尿病视网膜病变筛查方法的比较研究[J].中华眼底病杂志,2006,22(1):45-46. 被引量:18
  • 9高丽琴,张风,周海英,严伟,熊颖,王光璐.眼底彩色照像与荧光素眼底血管造影对判断糖尿病视网膜病变临床分期的一致性研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2008,44(1):12-16. 被引量:33

二级参考文献13

  • 1全国眼底病协作组.糖尿病性视网膜病变分期标准[J].中华眼科杂志,1985,21:113-113.
  • 2Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study research group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified airlie house classification: ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology, 1991,98 ( Suppl 5 ) :786-806.
  • 3Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein RE, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology, 2003,110: 1677- 1682.
  • 4Blackman NJ,Koval JJ. Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement. Stat Med ,2000,19:723-741.
  • 5Moss SE, Klein R, Kessler SD, et al. Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology, 1985,92:62-67.
  • 6Diabetes control and complications trial research group. Color photography vs fluorescein angiography in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Arch Ophthalmol, 1987,105 : 1344-1351.
  • 7Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R, et al. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1989,30:823-828.
  • 8Stellingwerf C, Hardus PL, Hooymans JM. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression. Doc Ophthalmol,2004 ,108 :203-209.
  • 9Khalaf SS, Al-Bdour MD, Al-Till MI. Clinical biomicroscopy versus fluorescein angiography: effectiveness and sensitivity in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol,2007 ,17 :84-88.
  • 10Taylor HR.Diabetic retinopathy:A public health challenge.Am J Ophthalmol,1997,123:543-545.

共引文献47

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部