期刊文献+

两种粘结系统树脂粘结剂机械强度的对比(英文) 被引量:1

A comparison study on the mechanical strength of two resin cements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:目前市场上可供选择的瓷粘结系统品种很多,机械强度是树脂水门汀能否应用于临床的先决条件。目的:观察Panavia F树脂粘结剂和自制树脂粘结剂机械强度的差异。设计、时间及地点:对比观察实验,于2006-05/2007-03在解放军第四军医大学修复实验室完成。材料:Panavia F树脂粘结剂由日本KURARAY MEDICAL INC.提供,自制树脂粘结剂由解放军第四军医大学口腔医学院研制。方法:分别制作高8mm,直径4mm的不同树脂粘结剂的圆柱形压缩强度试件5个,高3mm,直径6mm的圆柱形径向抗张强度试件5个,在AGS-500万能材料试验机测其压缩强度和径向抗张强度。主要观察指标:不同粘结系统中树脂粘结剂的压缩强度和径向抗张强度。结果:Panavia F树脂粘结剂的压缩强度明显高于自制树脂粘结剂[(238.92±24.54),(149.08±12.13)MPa,P<0.05],两者的径向抗张强度差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论:充分固化后两种树脂水门汀的径向抗张强度相近;虽然自制树脂粘结剂压缩强度低于Panavia F树脂粘结剂,但远高于ADA的规定标准(>70MPa),可满足临床要求。 There are many species of ceramic bonding systems supplied in market, the mechanical strength is a prerequisite condition for resin cement in clinical use. OBJECTIVE: To study the difference of mechanical strength between Panavia F resin cement and self-made resin cement. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: A controlled observational study was performed in the prosthesis laboratory of the Fourth Military Medical University of Chinese PLA between May 2006 and March 2007. MATERIALS: Panavia F resin cement was sourced from KURARAY MEDICAL INC. (Japan), experimental resin cement was produced by College of Stomatological Medicine in the Fourth Military Medical University of Chinese PLA. METHODS: Five cylindrical compressive strength specimens at an 8-mm height and 4-mm diameter were prepared, as well as 5 cylindrical diametral tensile strength specimens at a 3-mm height and 6-mm diameter. AGS-500 universal material testing machine was applied to detect the compressive strength and diametral tensile strength. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The diametral tensile strength test and compressive strength test of the specimens. RESULTS: The compressive strength of Panavia F resin cement was remarkably higher than that of experimental cement [(238.92_+24.54), (149.08_+12.13) MPa, P 〈 0.05]. There were no significances between two resin cements on diametral tensile strength (P 〉 0.05). CONCLUSION: There were no significance between two resin cements on diametral tensile strength following complete curing. The compressive strength of experimental resin cement can reach the standard of ADA (〉 70 MPa) although it is lower than the compressive strength of Panavia F resin cement.
机构地区 解放军第 解放军
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期1585-1588,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 树脂粘结剂 径向抗张强度 压缩强度 resin cement diametral tensile strength compressive strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献107

  • 1王晓洁,郭天文,张玉梅,邓在喜,张艺权,王宝成.钛铸件与三种钛瓷粉结合强度的对比研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2004,20(7):401-403. 被引量:9
  • 2范存晖,陈杰,刘新强,马欣.瓷面处理对金属托槽与瓷面粘接性能的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(4):341-344. 被引量:15
  • 3刘志功,钱法汤,钟申.光固化复合树脂与陶瓷的粘接强度及析因试验分析[J].口腔医学纵横,1995,11(3):165-168. 被引量:4
  • 4王军,周平,施长溪.热源性二次固化对复合树脂性能的影响[J].临床口腔医学杂志,1996,12(3):154-157. 被引量:3
  • 5[1]Yilmaz H,Dincer C.Comparison of the bond compatibility of titanium and a Ni-Cr alloy to dental porcelain [J].J Dent,1999; 27(3): 215-222.
  • 6[2]Kaus T,Prbster L,Weber H.Clinical follow up study of ceramic veneered titanium restorations-3 year result [J].Int J Prosthodontia,1996; 9(4): 56.
  • 7[3]Wang RR,Fung KK.Oxidation behaviour of surface-modified titanium-ceramic restorations [J].J Prosthet Dent,1997; 77(3):423-434.
  • 8[4]Knnen M,Kivilahti J.Bonding of low-fusing dental porcelain to commercially pure titanium [J].J Biomed Mat Res,1994; 28(6): 1027-1035.
  • 9[3]Morris HF. A comparison of the mechanical properties of several alternative metal ceramic alloys cast in clinical and research laboratories. [J]J prosthet Dent, 1989,62(2):146
  • 10[4]Libby G, Arcuri MR Lavelle WE. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. [J]J prosthet Dent, 1997,78:121- 131

共引文献61

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部