期刊文献+

摩托车声品质偏好性评价与分析 被引量:6

Subjective preference evaluation and analysis of motorcycle sound quality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以摩托车在不同发动机转速下驾驶员耳旁的声样本为评价对象,运用分组成对比较法进行偏好性主观评价实验,并在精确计算评价结果误判率的基础上,通过相关分析和多元回归分析,建立以心理声学参数描述偏好性主观评价结果的数学模型。研究结果表明,响度和粗糙度是影响摩托车噪声主观偏好性的主要参量,与线性数学模型相比,采用非线性数学模型可以更好地表达摩托车噪声主观偏好性与心理声学参数之间的关系。 Noise samples of motorcycles at different engine speeds taken at the position of the ear of a motorcycle operator are selected as the evaluation stimuli to investigate sound preferences of motorcycle sound quality. Subjective testing is carried out via the paired comparison method. Precise calculation of the misjudging rate is adopted to ensure test result reliability. Formulae between subjective preference scores and psychoacoustic parameters are obtained through linear correlation and muhi-dimensional regression analysis. The results indicate that loudness and roughness are two predominant metrics influencing preference evaluation for motorcycle noise, and the nonlinear equation better describes the dependence of subjective preference scores on psychoacoustic parameters than the linear one.
出处 《重庆大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期283-287,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University
基金 重庆市科委科技计划攻关资助项目(CSTC 2007AA6006-3) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20070410772)
关键词 声品质 主观评价 偏好性 成对比较 sound quality subjective evaluation preference paired comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1陈双籍,陈端石.基于心理声学参数的车内声品质偏好性评价[J].噪声与振动控制,2005,25(3):45-47. 被引量:36
  • 2毛东兴,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质成对比较主观评价的数据检验及判据[J].声学学报,2005,30(5):468-472. 被引量:70
  • 3毛东兴,高亚丽,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质主观评价的分组成对比较法研究[J].声学学报,2005,30(6):515-520. 被引量:53
  • 4Blauert J, Jekosch U. Sound-quality evaluation - A multilayered problem. Acta Acustica United With Acustica,1997; 83(5): 747-753.
  • 5Otto N et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds. Proceeding of the 1999 Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 1999. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-1822.
  • 6Guski R. Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 1997; 83(5): 765-774.
  • 7Bodden M, Heinrichs R, Linow A. Evaluation of interior vehichle noise using an efficient psychoacoustic method. Proceeding of Euronoise 98, Munich, Germany, 1998.
  • 8Chouard N. Perception of overall loudness and unpleasantness. Proceeding of Inter-noise 98, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998.
  • 9Susini P, McAdams S, and Winsberg S. A multidimensional technique for sound quality assessment. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 1999; 85(5): 650-656.
  • 10Bradley R A, Terry M E. The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. 1. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1952; 39(4): 324-345.

共引文献121

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部