摘要
目的评估3种促排卵方法治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)合并不孕症的临床效果。方法将75例PCOS不孕症患者采用完全随机设计方法分为3组各25例,氯米芬(CC)组给予CC治疗;尿促性素(HMG)组给予HMG方案,CC+HMG组给予CC+HMG序贯治疗。观察3组排卵率、妊娠率及并发症情况。结果CC组、HMG组和CC+HMG组排卵率分别为61.5%,87.7%,88.1%;妊娠率分别为24%,60%,56%:HMG组和CC+HMG组与CC组相比排卵率及妊娠率均升高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。HMG组与CC+HMG组排卵率、妊娠率比较无统计学意义(P〉0.05);但多胎妊娠率及卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率比较,HMG组高于CC组和CC+HMG组(P〈0.05)。结论采用HMG及CC+HMG序贯方案优于CC的促排卵治疗,CC+HMG方案保证妊娠率的同时可以降低多胎妊娠及OHSS的发生。
Objective To investigate the effects of three kinds of ovulation induction therapies for patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome ( PCOS ) related infertility. Methods Seventy-five patients of PCOS related infertility were divided into three groups ( groupl, 2, 3 ) randomly. Patients in different groups were treated with Clomide(CC), human menopasual gonadotropin (HMG)and CC + HMG in sequential respectively. The ovulation rates, pregnancy rates and complications were analyzed. Results The ovulation rates were 61.5 % ,87.7% and 88. 1% in group 1,2,3. The pregnancy rates were 24% ,60% and 56% in group 1,2,3, with significant difference between group 1 and group 2 or 3 (P 〈 0.05). There was no difference between group 2 and 3 in ovulation rates or pregnancy rates ( P 〉 0. 05 ). There was difference of occurrence rates of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) and twins between group 2 and group 1 or 3 ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion HMG and CC + HMG are better than CC ovulation induction therapies and CC might decrease the occurrence rates of OHSS and multiple pregnancy.
出处
《中国医药》
2009年第3期229-231,共3页
China Medicine
关键词
多囊卵巢综合征
不孕症
克罗米酚
尿促性腺激素
Polycystie ovarian syndrome
Infertility
Clomide
Human menopasual gonadotropin