期刊文献+

我国贸易自由化的环境效应分析——基于“污染避难所”假说与要素禀赋比较优势的检验 被引量:11

The Effect of Trade Liberalization on Environment:An Empirical Study Based on Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Comparative Advantage Determined by Factor Endowment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 贸易与环境的关系问题一直是人们关注的焦点。运用Antweiler,Copeland和Taylor(2001)的理论模型,实证分析了中国贸易自由化环境效应的主要影响路径,并着重考察了要素禀赋和污染控制成本在贸易自由化对环境变化的结构效应中的作用,结果表明:贸易自由化总体增加了污染排放,贸易的规模效应带来的污染增加超过了技术效应和结构效应引起的污染减少;"污染避难所"假说对于中国并不成立,中国要素禀赋决定的贸易模式使贸易自由化对环境的结构效应为负,即降低了环境污染。 The debate over the impact of international trade on environment has generated more heat than light.The pollution haven hypothesis postulates that low-income developing countries will be made dirtier with trade,while the simple factor endowment hypothesis suggests that with trade dirty capital intensive industries should migrate to the relatively capital abundant developed countries. The empirical test in this article based on the two theoties shows that in China trade liberalization have a positive effect on environment. The simple factor endowment hypothesis postulates a more serious impact on environment than Pollution haven hypothesis in our study.
作者 程雁 郑玉刚
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期65-70,共6页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 贸易自由化 环境效应 污染避难所 要素禀赋 trade liberalization environmental effect pollution haven hypothesis factor endowment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Grossman G. M. and Krueger A. B. , 1991, “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Papers No. 3914.
  • 2Selden, T. M. anti Song D. , 1994, “Environmenlal Quality and Development: Is lhere a Kuznets Curve for Air Poilutian Emissions?”,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, pp. 147-162.
  • 3Grossman, G. M, and Krneger A. B. , 1995, “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, pp. 353 -377.
  • 4Copeland, B. R and Taylor M. B. , 1994, “North-South Trade and Ihe Environment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, pp. 755 -787.
  • 5Esty, D.C. and Ceradin, D. , 1997, “Market access, Competitiveness, and Harmonization: Environmental Protection in Regional Trade agreements”, Harvard Environmental Law Review. 21, pp. 265-336.
  • 6Tobcy, J. A. , 1990, “The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade : An Empirical Test”, Kyklos, 43, pp. 191-209.
  • 7Aniweiler, W. , Copeland, B.R. and Taylor M.S. , 2001, “ Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?”, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 877-908.
  • 8张连众,朱坦,李慕菡,张伯伟.贸易自由化对我国环境污染的影响分析[J].南开经济研究,2003(3):3-5. 被引量:117
  • 9许士春.贸易对我国环境影响的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2006(3):63-68. 被引量:32
  • 10彭海珍.关于贸易自由化对中国环境影响的分析[J].财贸研究,2006,17(4):35-41. 被引量:15

二级参考文献34

  • 1王军.贸易和环境研究的现状与进展[J].世界经济,2004,27(7):67-79. 被引量:43
  • 2任若恩,刘晓生.关于中国资本存量估计的一些问题[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1997,13(1):19-24. 被引量:74
  • 3.中国环境年鉴[M].,2001..
  • 4.中国统计年鉴[M].,2001..
  • 5.《中国统计年鉴》[M].,1983.323页.
  • 6Grossman, G.M. and A.B. Krueger. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In The Mexico-U.S.free trade agreement, ed. P. M. Gather. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press, 1993: 13-56.
  • 7Antweiler Werner, Copeland Brian R. and Taylor M. Scott. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? NBER Working Paper,1998, 6707.
  • 8Antweiler Werner, Copeland Brian R. and Taylor M. Scott. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? NBER Working Paper,2000.
  • 9.《中国对外经济贸易白皮书》[M].,2001年.第78页.
  • 10Copeland,B,M.Scott Taylor,“North-South Trade and the Global Environment.”,Quarterly Journal of Economics,(109) 1994.

共引文献5725

同被引文献186

引证文献11

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部